2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigations on laminar burning velocity variation of CH4+H2+air mixtures at elevated temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be explained by the lower density and higher diffusivity of hydrogen that allow a higher diffusion of diesel vapor as well. However, this feature can lead to slightly retarded ignition of the mixture but is later compensated by the higher velocity of H2 oxidation [54,55], explaining the trends observed in Figure 12.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be explained by the lower density and higher diffusivity of hydrogen that allow a higher diffusion of diesel vapor as well. However, this feature can lead to slightly retarded ignition of the mixture but is later compensated by the higher velocity of H2 oxidation [54,55], explaining the trends observed in Figure 12.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This can be explained by the lower density and higher diffusivity of hydrogen that allow a higher diffusion of diesel vapor as well. However, this feature can lead to slightly retarded ignition of the mixture but is later compensated by the higher velocity of H 2 oxidation [54,55], explaining the trends observed in Figure 12. To better understand the combustion development of the HRF and LRF fuels, the images in Figure 14 show the dispersion of diesel vapor in the cylinder for the two extreme test cases (100% CH4 and 100% H2): in the case with air/hydrogen mixture, the vapor amount occupies a greater volume with higher penetration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…By comparing the predicted laminar flame velocities from each CRM, the model that best describes the combustion of CH 4 /H 2 can be identified. Figure 4 illustrates the flame velocity (S L ) obtained from experimental measurements [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] and numerical predictions at various pressures and preheating temperatures. Observing Figure 4a-c, it is evident that USC Mech 2.0 and San Diego exhibit similar flame velocity predictions across the entire range of equivalence ratios.…”
Section: Chemical Mechanism and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 illustrates the flame velocity ( S L ) obtained from experimental measurements [ 41–51 ] and numerical predictions at various pressures and preheating temperatures. Observing Figure 4a–c, it is evident that USC Mech 2.0 and San Diego exhibit similar flame velocity predictions across the entire range of equivalence ratios.…”
Section: Chemical Mechanism and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When these two gases are separately incorporated into natural gas, the combustion properties of the mixed gas change monotonically, which limits the practical application space of the mixed gas. Various combustion parameters of natural gas are between ammonia and hydrogen, so considering adding ammonia and hydrogen to natural gas simultaneously can reduce emissions while ensuring its original fuel properties. In addition, the deflagrate performance of a natural gas/ammonia/hydrogen mixture can also be adjusted to meet different needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%