2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2019.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigations on the behavior of GFRP bar reinforced HSC and UHSC beams under static and impact loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that when a new crack initiated, the load recorded by the load cell decreased slightly due to the release and redistribution of stress. The curve includes three main stages, namely, the uncracked stage (OA), the post-cracking stage (AB), and the post-concretecrushing stage (BC), which have been also reported in the previous studies on both OPC beams [32,33] and GPC beams [30,34] reinforced with GFRP bars. The initial crack occurred at the load of 17.8 kN (point A) and the stiffness of the beam decreased from 59.0 kN/mm to 4.2 kN/mm.…”
Section: Quasi-static Responsesmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It can be seen that when a new crack initiated, the load recorded by the load cell decreased slightly due to the release and redistribution of stress. The curve includes three main stages, namely, the uncracked stage (OA), the post-cracking stage (AB), and the post-concretecrushing stage (BC), which have been also reported in the previous studies on both OPC beams [32,33] and GPC beams [30,34] reinforced with GFRP bars. The initial crack occurred at the load of 17.8 kN (point A) and the stiffness of the beam decreased from 59.0 kN/mm to 4.2 kN/mm.…”
Section: Quasi-static Responsesmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The crack patterns of these two types of beams were similar while the BFRP reinforced IPC beams had a much larger maximum crack width due to the lower elastic modulus of BFRP bars as compared to steel bars. However, the test results by other researchers on both OPC and GPC beams reinforced with FRP bars experienced three-stage loadmidspan deflection curves, i.e., an uncracked stage, a post-cracking stage, and a post-concrete crushing stage that the beam could carry further load after concrete started crushing [30,[32][33][34]. Maranan et al [30] considered this behaviour could be due to the confinement effect provided by the FRP stirrups that enhanced the ductility and strength of the beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the purpose of protective design of RC structures against impact loads, several research works can be found in the literature investigating the performance of RC beams retrofitted and reinforced by high-strength composite materials such FRP [197,198], steel fiber reinforced concrete (SFRC) [199] CFRP laminates [200][201][202], UHPFRC [187], recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) [184], glass FRP (GFRP) rebars [203], engineered cementitious composites (ECC) containing polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibers [204], high strength steel wire mesh and high performance mortar (HSSWM-HPM) [182], coconut fibre reinforced concrete (CFRC) beams strengthened with flax fibre reinforced polymer (FFRP) [205], or strengthened by steel jackets [138,205]. Also, there exist some limited numbers of research works studying the performance of precast concrete beams under impact loads [172,183].…”
Section: Concrete Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%