2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigations on the implosion characteristics of thin cylindrical aluminium-alloy tubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because in contrast to ASME BPVC-X, NASA SP-8007 requires a longitudinal/circumferential wave number of buckling The FE results match well against the experimental data of Section 2.2.2. This is also confirmed in several references [7][8][9][10]12,14]. Based on these comparisons, the accuracy of design codes for the prediction of collapse strength could be considered insufficient.…”
Section: Comparison Against Engineering Standardssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because in contrast to ASME BPVC-X, NASA SP-8007 requires a longitudinal/circumferential wave number of buckling The FE results match well against the experimental data of Section 2.2.2. This is also confirmed in several references [7][8][9][10]12,14]. Based on these comparisons, the accuracy of design codes for the prediction of collapse strength could be considered insufficient.…”
Section: Comparison Against Engineering Standardssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Research publications with focus on the collapse strength of pressure hull[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emission of a shock wave at the point of contact can be clearly observed. This type of implosion shock waves have been observed and investigated in the past in the context of hydrostatic collapse [13,43,44,45]. Notably, in the final configuration, the two lobes of of the structure extends in the vertical direction, that is, in the propagation direction of the incident shock wave.…”
Section: Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 95%