2021
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0003197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Investigations on the Lateral Cyclic Response of Post-Tensioned Rocking Steel Bridge Piers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prestress losses of LPPW2 were 13.4% and 9.8%, lower than those of LPPW1. This could be attributed to the reuse of the PT system in the tests, which reduced the influence of the wedge seating in the anchorage system 26 …”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The prestress losses of LPPW2 were 13.4% and 9.8%, lower than those of LPPW1. This could be attributed to the reuse of the PT system in the tests, which reduced the influence of the wedge seating in the anchorage system 26 …”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be attributed to the reuse of the PT system in the tests, which reduced the influence of the wedge seating in the anchorage system. 26…”
Section: Test Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inclusion of superstructure elements in the numerical model of rocking steel piers results in a more realistic prediction of the dynamic responses. When the superstructure is lumped at the mass centre, the reduction of the column contribution in carrying gravity loads due to permanent shortening cannot be captured 39 . The superstructure was modelled as a frame, based on the method proposed by Aviram et al., 40 and discretized by BEAM188 elements.…”
Section: Description Of Bridge Fe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stable hysteresis response, high ductility capacity and negligible residual drift, mainly attributed to the gap opening/closing mechanism, are the main advantages of such a pier. Therefore, it is capable of offering immediate service or service limited seismic performance levels for bridges located in active seismic regions 25–27 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%