2019
DOI: 10.37358/mp.19.3.5225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Investigations Regarding the Behaviour of Composite Panels Based on Polyurea and Kevlar or Dyneema Layers Under Blast and Fragments

Abstract: This paper presents an experimental study to determine the behaviour of composite panels, made of polyurea sprayed on Kevlar or Dyneema support layers, under blast and fragments produced by an improvised explosive device (IED). The fragments used for tests were steel bearing balls of 8 and 10 mm propelled by a plastic explosive charge and bullets cal. 7.62 mm, type Full Metal Jacketed Armor Piercing (FMJ AP) and Hollow Point Boat Tail (HPBT), with impact velocity greater than 500 m/s. To determine the fragment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large number of papers refers to the polyurea coatings on structures used to mitigate blast and impact effects, especially for decreasing the damaging effect on structures used for individual or collective ballistic protection [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of papers refers to the polyurea coatings on structures used to mitigate blast and impact effects, especially for decreasing the damaging effect on structures used for individual or collective ballistic protection [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third material used is ABS (Acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene). The material is easy to process without the need for a heated bed and does not produce smoke during construction [33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All this stipulates that at the mesoscale level the characteristics in the contact area can be reduced, so that the size of the nozzle hole must be reduced, but not randomly. The increase of the contact surfaces [3,5,10,11,38] is considered to give very good results if the vacuum density is between -5% and -27% (1), depending on the direction of the efforts (Figure 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%