2011
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental litter size reduction reveals costs of gestation and delayed effects on offspring in a viviparous lizard

Abstract: Experimental studies have often been employed to study costs of reproduction, but rarely to study costs of gestation. Disentangling the relative importance of each stage of the reproductive cycle should help to assess the costs and benefits of different reproductive strategies. To that end, we experimentally reduced litter size during gestation in a viviparous lizard. We measured physiological and behavioural parameters during gestation and shortly after parturition, as well as survival and growth of females a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
5
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
4
41
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clarifying the energy implications of reproductive mode is a vital component in understanding selective pressures behind the evolution of viviparity (Shine and Schwarzkopf, 1992;Qualls and Shine, 1998;Bleu et al, 2012). Herein, we used the reproductively bimodal lizard Z. vivipara to compare the metabolic costs of reproduction between oviparous and viviparous individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clarifying the energy implications of reproductive mode is a vital component in understanding selective pressures behind the evolution of viviparity (Shine and Schwarzkopf, 1992;Qualls and Shine, 1998;Bleu et al, 2012). Herein, we used the reproductively bimodal lizard Z. vivipara to compare the metabolic costs of reproduction between oviparous and viviparous individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investment in current reproduction such as production of a heavier litter must incur a cost for females, otherwise mothers from the control group would have produced large offspring as well. Production of larger pups can sometimes lead to a reduction in future fecundity or survival of mothers (Oksanen et al, 2002;Bleu et al, 2012). Overall, we suggest that our results can be interpreted as an adaptive parental strategy, preparing offspring for a pathogen-rich environment by influencing their growth and size.…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 78%
“…Reproductive output is lower in S. reevesii than in S. modesta, but selection for increased maternal body volume does not differ between the two lizards with different reproductive modes. The reasons why female S. reevesii do not compensate for their lower reproductive output by increasing overall body size, or by increasing relative abdomen size, are currently unknown, but gestation costs such as increased metabolism (Angilletta and Sears, 2000), decreased locomotor capacity (Miles et al, 2000), impaired immune function (Ilmonen et al, 2003), reduced growth (Cox et al, 2010) and decreased postpartum body condition (Bleu et al, 2011) cannot be precluded as an important factor. Future work should investigate whether an adaptive reduction of reproductive output will enhance fitness in viviparous females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%