1997
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0702(1997)2:1(1)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Load Rating of a Posted Bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowak and Tharmabala (1998) used test data to improve the accuracy of load and resistance models. Studies on bridge evaluation with non-destructive field test methods were carried out by Chajes et al (1997), Scott et al (2003), and Rens et al (2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nowak and Tharmabala (1998) used test data to improve the accuracy of load and resistance models. Studies on bridge evaluation with non-destructive field test methods were carried out by Chajes et al (1997), Scott et al (2003), and Rens et al (2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Law et al (1995) derived the best estimation of the moment of inertia of a girder by fitting the first frequency of the finite element model and the test results. Chajes et al (1997) used diagnostic testing results to determine the composite section properties of the girders and support restraints, and then to develop a numerical model of the bridge to estimate the maximum allowable load. Jauregui and Barr (2004) developed an equivalent frame model to calculate the load distribution factor for bridge load rating by comparing the moment distribution in the longitudinal direction obtained from different finite element models with the field test data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research builds on prior work on the field testing, experimental testing, analysis, and design of curved I-girder bridge systems, as well as diagnostic testing of straight I-girder bridges (e.g. [3][4][5]). Well-documented diagnostic field tests of curved steel girder bridges include Beal [6] on four curved steel bridges: two singlespan I-girder bridges, one two-span continuous I-girder bridge, and one two-span continuous box girder bridge were tested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bridge load capacity is usually controlled by flexural stresses, and these can be calculated from measured strains. Strains can easily be measured in steel bridges by attaching electrical resistance strain gages to the steel girders [7,8]. Electrical resistance strain gages can also be used to measure strains in prestressed girder bridges [9] because the prestressing prevents the concrete from cracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%