2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental manipulation of mixed-species flocks reveals heterospecific audience effects on calling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the number and kind of heterospecific species/individuals, the presence of other parids, and environmental conditions all influenced the probability of territorial aggression. These findings confirm emerging insights and expectations concerning impacts of heterospecific audiences on avian social interactions (Coppinger et al., 2020; Magrath et al., 2020). However, our work is novel in detecting strong heterospecific audience effects on aggression, a pervasive social interaction within free‐living bird communities not generally considered as being connected to heterospecific influences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the number and kind of heterospecific species/individuals, the presence of other parids, and environmental conditions all influenced the probability of territorial aggression. These findings confirm emerging insights and expectations concerning impacts of heterospecific audiences on avian social interactions (Coppinger et al., 2020; Magrath et al., 2020). However, our work is novel in detecting strong heterospecific audience effects on aggression, a pervasive social interaction within free‐living bird communities not generally considered as being connected to heterospecific influences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Also, TUTI exhibited higher aggression overall than CACH (both intraspecific and interspecific). Given that most interspecific aggressive interactions among closely related bird species are asymmetrical and favor the larger species (Martin et al., 2017), it is clear that the larger‐bodied TUTI is the dominant species (Cimprich & Grubb, 1994; Coppinger et al., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, birds responding to each other alarm calls are more readily seen as by‐product mutualism, where the information produced is mostly directed towards conspecifics and, by chance, is also useful to heterospecifics listeners (Bradbury & Vehrencamp, 2011). However, recent studies have begun to unravel complex interactions between different species, especially in bird flocks (Carlson et al., 2020; Coppinger et al., 2020; Goodale & Kotagama, 2008). The gathering of birds of different species, either all year round in tropical environments (Goodale et al., 2015) or during the non‐breeding season in temperate environments (Dutour et al., 2019), is widespread and usually thought to be beneficial for both foraging efficiency and predator defence (Berner & Grubb, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%