1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4622(96)02238-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental measurement of the effective dielectric in the hydrophobic core of a protein

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
272
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(287 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
14
272
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In calculating the excitonic interaction coefficients, the choice of the dielectric constant value, and the method chosen for screening and local field effects is no trivial matter [28]. Typically, effective protein dielectric constant values are chosen between 2 and 4; however, experimental measures of the dielectric coefficients in protein hydrophobic pockets indicate this value is well above this range, arguing against this practice [29]. The experimentally measured tubulin optical dielectric value of 8.41 falls well outside this range [30], and is expected to have a significant impact on coupling strengths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In calculating the excitonic interaction coefficients, the choice of the dielectric constant value, and the method chosen for screening and local field effects is no trivial matter [28]. Typically, effective protein dielectric constant values are chosen between 2 and 4; however, experimental measures of the dielectric coefficients in protein hydrophobic pockets indicate this value is well above this range, arguing against this practice [29]. The experimentally measured tubulin optical dielectric value of 8.41 falls well outside this range [30], and is expected to have a significant impact on coupling strengths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X-ray crystallography and equilibrium thermodynamic studies were used previously to characterize in detail the properties of internal Glu and Lys residues at positions 66 and 92 in staphylococcal nuclease (SNase) (11)(12)(13)(22)(23)(24). The crystal structures show that these internal groups are buried deeply in the hydrophobic core of the protein.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to fix this is to invoke a stronger dielectric screening (a much larger dielectric constant) in the Coulomb interaction between charged residues as suggested by Warshel and coworkers in another context (32). There is some experimental evidence for this (28). Another possible approach to fix this problem is to introduce a penalty function between oppositely charged residues as was suggested by Jacobson and Friesner in connection with their loop geometry optimizations (unpublished results).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%