2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.07.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental measurement of thermal diffusivity, conductivity and specific heat capacity of metallic powders at room and high temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is known that the thermal diffusivity of the solid tungsten can be approximated by the constant value κ W = 50 mm 2 /s in a wide temperature range [56,57]. For the powder material the value of thermal diffusivity can be less than those one of the solid material in about 20 times [58]. Thus, for the rough assessment, in the calculations we used the value κ = κ W /2 = 25 mm 2 /s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is known that the thermal diffusivity of the solid tungsten can be approximated by the constant value κ W = 50 mm 2 /s in a wide temperature range [56,57]. For the powder material the value of thermal diffusivity can be less than those one of the solid material in about 20 times [58]. Thus, for the rough assessment, in the calculations we used the value κ = κ W /2 = 25 mm 2 /s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same conclusion can be The thermal diffusivity values of the IN718 powder are on the order of 4 × 10 −4 cm 2 /s when the Clark and Taylor model is applied. According to references [26,39], the average thermal diffusivity of IN718 powder over temperature ranges from 26.85 • C to 526.85 • C and from 100.4 • C to 550.2 • C is 1.5 × 10 −3 cm 2 /s and 1.6 × 10 −3 cm 2 /s, respectively. The strong deviation between the literature results and the Clark and Taylor analysis of an assumed pseudo homogeneous tri-layer system shows that a more refined approach is necessary to analyze the raw data, i.e., the temperature or voltage vs. time curves than the Clark and Taylor model.…”
Section: Powder Sample Special Sample Holdermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [25] investigated the thermal conductivity of metal powder in LPBF AM for IN625 and Ti64 powders using a TA Instruments DLF 1200 laser flash instrument, and finite element (FE) heat transfer modeling. Ahsan et al [26] determined the thermal diffusivity of IN718, Ti-6Al-4V and SS 304L metallic powders using the laser flash technique with a DXF 900 instrument. For their measurements, they used encapsulated powder samples in a holder with a lid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, nickel is a ferromagnetic material having a Curie point, i.e. a certain temperature above which the conductivity and heat capacity both increase (Ahsan et al, 2020).…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The keyhole region is non-desirable in AM processes, as it is associated with built parts with higher porosity and poorer mechanical properties. Thus, in determining the optimal process parameters, those parameter combinations which fall within the keyhole region (as identified by equation (2.6) in (Ahsan et al, 2020)) can be immediately discounted and the search for the optimal process conditions focused on the remaining areas of the input design space instead.…”
Section: Powder Bed Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%