1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00836545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental method of determining parameters characterizing the microstructure of micropolar liquids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the boundary surface does not rotate, w coincides with the angular velocity of a fluid microelement relative to this boundary. In this case, in the laboratory system of coordinates the proper angular velocity of medium particles v will be only a fraction of w, and so the boundary condition may be formulated as (7).…”
Section: Vb=g-~mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If the boundary surface does not rotate, w coincides with the angular velocity of a fluid microelement relative to this boundary. In this case, in the laboratory system of coordinates the proper angular velocity of medium particles v will be only a fraction of w, and so the boundary condition may be formulated as (7).…”
Section: Vb=g-~mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the boundary condition (5) to be physically the most general and correct. However, it makes it impossible to estimate fluid microstructure parameters using the methods given in [7] and [8], which were applied for different boundary conditions. Condiff and Dahler [4] suggested a kinematic boundary condition in which two limiting cases are considered, namely, "no spin" and "no antisymmetric stress" at the boundary.…”
Section: Vb=g-~mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the parameters may depend on the concentration and shape of the microelements, and a determination of the parameter values is a difficult matter [5]. The experimental work of Migun and colleagues (see, for example, Migun [12], Kolpashchikov et al [9], Migoun & Prokhorenko [11]) suggests that N 1 = O(1) for water in capillary tubes, whereas N 2 and N 3 must be non-negative for micropolar fluids [4]. For comparison with existing studies, in this work we set s = 0 , N 1,2 = 1 , N 3 = 10 −1 and investigate solution behaviour as Re is varied.…”
Section: C485mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common comment in respect of micropolar uids was that there are no experiments whatsoever in which any of the material moduli could be measured. The work of Migoun [5] demonstrated an experimental method of determining parameters characterizing the microstructure of such uids and seems to have laid to rest many doubts on the theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%