2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2016.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental methods: When and why contextual instructions are important

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
96
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
96
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Economic experiments also demonstrate that context affects incentivized behavior. Alekseev et al () survey the literature and conclude that context often but not invariably improves performance with the improvement being more likely if the task requires sophisticated reasoning. (While the survey did not contain any secretary problem studies, the task seems to qualify as requiring sophisticated reasoning.…”
Section: Relationship To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economic experiments also demonstrate that context affects incentivized behavior. Alekseev et al () survey the literature and conclude that context often but not invariably improves performance with the improvement being more likely if the task requires sophisticated reasoning. (While the survey did not contain any secretary problem studies, the task seems to qualify as requiring sophisticated reasoning.…”
Section: Relationship To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…to ensure that the median income was below the mean (consistent with the theoretical assumption needed to assure the median voter's choice of public provision would be supported if there was a majority-rule vote on public-only versus private-only provision). 5 To keep participants actively thinking about their decisions, incomes were assigned in a pre-determined pseudo-random order such that in each session participants experienced each of the five income levels in the first five periods and then again in the last five periods of the treatments in which they participated, but the income levels were experienced in a different order over each five period phase. Each of the five participants in a group was instructed to submit the tax rate that he or she prefers to have imposed on everyone in the group to finance the provision of the private good given that the median of the preferred tax rates would be selected and implemented.…”
Section: Laboratory Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] and [4] discuss the need to consider the framing context of an experiment before drawing general conclusions because without that context, the experimenter is unable to control for the contexts participants impose themselves. [5] discusses "when and why" the context of the controlled laboratory environment that may matter and describe three types of context: abstract, meaningful and evocative. If participants instinctively create their own context for the neutral investment environment in order to better understand the problems, and especially if different participants choose different contexts, it is possible that researchers may lose some control of their environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The specific wording was based on multiple rounds of testing and evaluation during the pilot study. Based on this evaluation, we framed the public goods as 'projects' and contributions as 'investments', without expecting significant impact of this framing on game behavior (Alekseev et al, 2017); 5 we will use the terms interchangeably throughout the paper. Contact information to a designated contact person at the research consultancy was provided in case anything was unclear (20 of our 450 subjects used this possibility).…”
Section: Sampling and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%