1955
DOI: 10.1038/jid.1955.80
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Microsporum Lanosum Infection in Dogs, Cats and Rabbits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1962
1962
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar sequence of events has occurred after reinfection in other laboratoryanimals, such as the rabbit, dog, and cat, i.e., a shorter incubation period and a shorter period of fungus-positive lesions (Reiss and Leonard, 1955).…”
Section: Acquired Resistance In Animalsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…A similar sequence of events has occurred after reinfection in other laboratoryanimals, such as the rabbit, dog, and cat, i.e., a shorter incubation period and a shorter period of fungus-positive lesions (Reiss and Leonard, 1955).…”
Section: Acquired Resistance In Animalsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Antifungal Formulations-Reiss et al (15,16) were among the earliest investigators to induce experimental Microsporum lanosum infections in dogs, cats, and rabbits for the purpose of screening antifungal compounds. The best models were newborn rabbits infected with M. lanosum, since they showed the least individual variation during the infection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%