2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental modal parameter identification and validation of cantilever beam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Figure 3, Kraft paper samples were molded into a half-cane configuration with a 32.4 mm diameter (D), fixed (glued with epoxy resin) by two rigid steel rods (A304) with the same diameter. It is estimated that the half-cane configuration (I = 0.1098(R 4 − r 4 ) − 0.283R 2 r 2 (R − r)/(R + r)~393.23 mm 4 , where R and r are, respectively the major and minor radius of the sample) itself (i.e., excluding the effect of the steel rods) is able to significantly increase the moment of area, relative to the cantilever configuration (I = bh 3 /12~0.02 mm 4 , where b and h are, respectively the width and thickness of the beam). A model of the testing apparatus for the half-cane approach is shown in Figure 4, in which the same acoustic excitation through a loudspeaker and displacement measurement by a Laser Döppler Vibrometer may be observed.…”
Section: Modal Analysis-optimized Half-cane Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Figure 3, Kraft paper samples were molded into a half-cane configuration with a 32.4 mm diameter (D), fixed (glued with epoxy resin) by two rigid steel rods (A304) with the same diameter. It is estimated that the half-cane configuration (I = 0.1098(R 4 − r 4 ) − 0.283R 2 r 2 (R − r)/(R + r)~393.23 mm 4 , where R and r are, respectively the major and minor radius of the sample) itself (i.e., excluding the effect of the steel rods) is able to significantly increase the moment of area, relative to the cantilever configuration (I = bh 3 /12~0.02 mm 4 , where b and h are, respectively the width and thickness of the beam). A model of the testing apparatus for the half-cane approach is shown in Figure 4, in which the same acoustic excitation through a loudspeaker and displacement measurement by a Laser Döppler Vibrometer may be observed.…”
Section: Modal Analysis-optimized Half-cane Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current numerical approaches (e.g., modal and harmonic analysis) allow a very close prediction of the dynamic behavior of structures [4], given that the input parameters for these computational routines are correctly implemented [5]. Material properties, for instance, are fundamental to obtain a reliable prediction of the dynamic behavior of a structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, experimental modal analysis (EMA) was implemented in the research effort towards analyzing certain structural components from the research effort's structural design, for validating the computational modal analysis approach. EMA has been implemented in numerous previous works, such as Rosly et al [30], Othman et al [31], Nadkarni et al [32], and many others. Through EMA, the computationally computed modal results were successfully validated, hence affording a reasonable level of confidence in the computational results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the simulation modal test was verified with experimental results. Nadkarni et al [ 16 ] identified the dynamic characteristics of a cantilever beam by experimental modal analysis, and a numerical method was carried out to validate the experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%