2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental model to evaluate in vivo and in vitro cartilage MR imaging by means of histological analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In several other studies different MRI sequences were used to detect cartilage degeneration [15,116,117]. It was confirmed that even after MRI examinations with FLASH and DESS sequences low correlation in terms of sensitivity and specificity was found for both sequences in normal to mild Mankin grades [112]. Only moderate to severe changes were diagnosed with higher significance and specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In several other studies different MRI sequences were used to detect cartilage degeneration [15,116,117]. It was confirmed that even after MRI examinations with FLASH and DESS sequences low correlation in terms of sensitivity and specificity was found for both sequences in normal to mild Mankin grades [112]. Only moderate to severe changes were diagnosed with higher significance and specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For the detection of OA with MRI, lots of different sequences are available and used [1,111,112,113]. There is general agreement that cartilage damage evaluation with standard MRI examination remains problematic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 However, the work by Bittersohl et al reports poor classification accuracy for detecting early histological stages of OA in humans, suggesting a need for more sensitive quantitative measures. 43 Building upon earlier methods, the OARSI histopathology assessment system was developed specifically to increase dynamic range over the disease process and improve stratification within early and mild OA states 18 , thereby improving detection of matrix-level changes that precede development of structural OA identifiable by morphological imaging. 26 Further, the OARSI assessment has demonstrated higher reliability and reproducibility compared to earlier methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histological scoring systems that assess the structural composition of cartilage matrix and determine the severity of degradation 31 can be used as a reference standard to establish a classification scheme using image features 3234 . The OARSI histopathology assessment has been shown to be reliable and reproducible 35 and is an informative gold standard for cartilage classification using quantitative MR measurements 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%