2018
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental noxious stimulation of the right masseter muscle does not affect bilateral masseter and temporalis muscle activity and force parameters during standardised isometric biting tasks

Abstract: The findings suggest that experimentally induced right masseter muscle pain does not modify force or surface jaw muscle EMG activity during isometric biting tasks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many previous studies of isometric biting and clenching activities indicate that the vertical force task of the present study will involve activity in the bilateral masseter, medial pterygoid and temporalis muscles . The medial pterygoid muscle forms a muscle sling with the masseter muscle and these, with the temporalis, are ideally suited to being the principal agonist muscles or prime movers that generate the closing forces involved in the vertical tasks .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many previous studies of isometric biting and clenching activities indicate that the vertical force task of the present study will involve activity in the bilateral masseter, medial pterygoid and temporalis muscles . The medial pterygoid muscle forms a muscle sling with the masseter muscle and these, with the temporalis, are ideally suited to being the principal agonist muscles or prime movers that generate the closing forces involved in the vertical tasks .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Moreover, participants who have had a computer tomography (CT) scan in the last 12 months were excluded as well as individuals where it was anticipated that CT scans may be required. Many of the procedures have been described previously in detail …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The non-significant decrease of the MVBF in the 60min trial might be explained by an activity compensation in other non-affected muscle parts or muscles [43][44][45][46][47][48][49] or a modification in sensory input from muscle receptors that were affected by the increased intercuspal distance that led to stretching the fibers in the jaw-closing muscles [50]. Since our study included assessing bite forces, a transducer had to be placed in-between the teeth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-signi cant decrease of the MVBF in the 60-minute trial might be explained by an activity compensation in other non-affected muscle parts or muscles (43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49) or a modi cation in sensory input from muscle receptors that were affected by the increased intercuspal distance that led to stretching the bers in the jaw-closing muscles (50). Since our study included assessing bite forces, a transducer had to be placed in-between the teeth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%