2004
DOI: 10.1109/tps.2004.823995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Observations of the Virtual Anode Motion and Streamer Breakdown Mechanisms in a Pseudospark Discharge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Fig. 4, The virtual anode speed was observed to decrease as the virtual anode approaches the hollow cathode cavity, which is consistent with the analytical model of virtual anode formation first proposed by Lucas's experimental observations [13,14] to explain the rapid discharge formation at low pressure. However, at this time α ionization process will continue.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As shown in Fig. 4, The virtual anode speed was observed to decrease as the virtual anode approaches the hollow cathode cavity, which is consistent with the analytical model of virtual anode formation first proposed by Lucas's experimental observations [13,14] to explain the rapid discharge formation at low pressure. However, at this time α ionization process will continue.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
“…2 and 7). This bright front propagation occurs > 1.5 µs after the breakdown process has ended, demonstrating that it is different from streamer fronts [22] associated with breakdown mechanisms. The time scale rules out ion acoustic velocities (8 km/s) from consideration and the flow direction rules out electrostatic acceleration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Zambra et al [19] have examined the movement characteristics of a virtual anode in single-gap pseudospark discharge under pulsed voltages for seven different gas pressures. The mean velocity increases monotonically with pressure from a range of 21.73-49.75 cm/µs at 10 Pa to a range of 77.02-112.82 cm/µs at 70 Pa. Based on the results, we can calculate that the mean time of virtual anode through the anode-cathode gap of 1 cm equality to each gap distance is about 10ns at 80 Pa. As the cathode-anode gap distance is 8 cm, the delay should be about 80 ns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%