1958
DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1958.tb20696.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Performance of ‘Miracle’ Water Conditioners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1964
1964
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The issue was raised in the early 1950s when commercial “water conditioners” using permanent magnets were sold as a unit [1]. It was said that such water conditioners could remove old scale and prevent new scale from forming in water pipes or water boilers if the water passed through a magnetic field created by the permanent magnet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The issue was raised in the early 1950s when commercial “water conditioners” using permanent magnets were sold as a unit [1]. It was said that such water conditioners could remove old scale and prevent new scale from forming in water pipes or water boilers if the water passed through a magnetic field created by the permanent magnet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was said that such water conditioners could remove old scale and prevent new scale from forming in water pipes or water boilers if the water passed through a magnetic field created by the permanent magnet. However, a report in 1958 showed that water conditioners, or even a much stronger magnetic field, could not alter the scale-forming properties of water [1]. Since that time, there have been many contradictory arguments opinions on the effect of a magnetic field on water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A considerable number of assertions from production plant engineers claim economic benefits (Diamant, 1970). However an equally respectable number of laboratory investigations fail to show an effect (Welder and Partridge, 1954;Eliassen et al, 1958).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Mulder ( 5 ) bezieht sich in seiner Ablehnung des Cepi-Gerates in erster Linie auf Arbeiten von Schumann ( l l ) , soweit es dieses Gerat angeht, und ist damit in Ubereinstimmung mit der spateren Arbeit von Eliassen, Skrinde und Davis (12 Mkller und Marschner folgern, dai3 ihre Ergebnisse beziiglich der Modifikation den Feststellungen Ryhachs widersprechen und bezurlich der Korngrofie und Gefaflwandhaftung mit den Angaben Friedels und der Firmenschrift fur die Cepi-Gerate nicht ubereinstimmen.…”
Section: Magnetische Und Strahlungs-gerate Zur Wasserbehandlung Und Zunclassified