2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental photon energy response of different dosimetric materials for a dual detector system combining thermoluminescence and optically stimulated luminescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To compare the results of this study with those obtained by the aforementioned authors, data of their work, provided by them, were normalized to the results of this study for a common energy, so that results could be comparable in the same graphic (Figure 4.2). The energy-dependent response observed in the results is consistent with the expected, based on the Al2O3:C mass energy absorption coefficient and effective number (Gasparian et al, 2012;Malthez et al, 2014) as it was previously explained (Section 2.7). This energy dependence in diagnostic energy range can be corrected with proper calibration (Gasparian, 2009).…”
Section: Energy Responsesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To compare the results of this study with those obtained by the aforementioned authors, data of their work, provided by them, were normalized to the results of this study for a common energy, so that results could be comparable in the same graphic (Figure 4.2). The energy-dependent response observed in the results is consistent with the expected, based on the Al2O3:C mass energy absorption coefficient and effective number (Gasparian et al, 2012;Malthez et al, 2014) as it was previously explained (Section 2.7). This energy dependence in diagnostic energy range can be corrected with proper calibration (Gasparian, 2009).…”
Section: Energy Responsesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The OSL signal for each quality was evaluated by calculating the average of the three responses, and the uncertainties were obtained as the standard deviation of the mean response (k = 1). Responses of the dosimeters for the RQT 8, 9, and 10 beam qualities showed an approximately linear behavior, whereas those for the RQR 2, 4, 5, 6, and 8 followed a non-uniform energy dependence, similar to those found in the literature (Al-Senan & Hatab, 2011;Gasparian et al, 2012;Malthez et al, 2014).…”
Section: Energy Responsesupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations