1983
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90339-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental primary cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy: Timing and fetal outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly identifiable signs and symptoms are not observed in pregnant women as they are often asymptomatic or the infection displays signs and symptoms that are nonspecific. In this population, it is very important to differentiate primary from secondary infection, as primary infection is much more injurious for the fetus than secondary infection and the clinical sequelae more severe if transmission occurs early in pregnancy [42][43][44] .…”
Section: Cytomegalovirus Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly identifiable signs and symptoms are not observed in pregnant women as they are often asymptomatic or the infection displays signs and symptoms that are nonspecific. In this population, it is very important to differentiate primary from secondary infection, as primary infection is much more injurious for the fetus than secondary infection and the clinical sequelae more severe if transmission occurs early in pregnancy [42][43][44] .…”
Section: Cytomegalovirus Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In utero transmission of CMV can occur during primary maternal infection, reactivation, or reinfection of seropositive mothers. Most concern centers on primary maternal infection, due to the potential for significant fetal damage when the infection is acquired and transmitted during the first trimester (30,48). Perinatal infections can result through virus transmission from many parts of the birth canal (39); however, the majority of these infections are asymptomatic (43).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuing advancements in technology, however, mean reliable and inexpensive serologic tests are available, prenatal diagnostic procedures with acceptable negative predictive values (NPV) can be performed, and trials of neonatal antiviral treatments are ongoing (25,34,37,50,52). Proposed diagnostic algorithms have focused on first-trimester screening, since the time of infection can be accurately obtained in the absence of seroconversion data, and the clinical sequelae of congenital CMV is usually more severe if transmission occurs early in gestation (30,48). A high positive predictive value (PPV) and NPV for clinical disease have been determined for quantitative PCR testing of amniotic fluid (26); however, there is an increased risk of a false-negative result if fewer than 7 weeks have elapsed between the onset of maternal infection and the time of amniocentesis (5,36).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burton and Watson (6) suggest that the basement membrane is an important placental barrier, since transient trophoblast damage down to the TBM followed by repair is often observed without concomitant fetal consequences (5,54). Lack of basal release from infected trophoblasts and/or the presence of a TBM acting as an effective barrier may explain why vertical transmission does not occur more frequently in the first trimester than in the third trimester (9,29) even though first-trimester trophoblasts are more readily infected (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%