2016 IEEE PES Transmission &Amp; Distribution Conference and Exposition-Latin America (PES T&D-La) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/tdc-la.2016.7805679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental procedure to obtain electromagnetic properties of A-36 low carbon steel plates utilized in transformers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these differences are not so significant, and thus the analyses of their results can be performed on the basis of an average behavior. Thus, in Figure 6(a), a graphic with the results of the volumetric losses, obtained by Aragon-Verduzco et al (2016), is added as a reference in view of the comparison to the results obtained using the proposed method. In fact, the results obtained using the two different methods are significantly similar and show a very good agreement.…”
Section: Analyses Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, these differences are not so significant, and thus the analyses of their results can be performed on the basis of an average behavior. Thus, in Figure 6(a), a graphic with the results of the volumetric losses, obtained by Aragon-Verduzco et al (2016), is added as a reference in view of the comparison to the results obtained using the proposed method. In fact, the results obtained using the two different methods are significantly similar and show a very good agreement.…”
Section: Analyses Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the behavior of the AC magnetization curve, shown in Figure 6(b), is also compared to that of (Aragon-Verduzco et al, 2016). In this case, the results obtained using the proposed method, for Toroids A and B, keep a very close similarity, mutually, whereas they significantly differ from the results of (Aragon-Verduzco et al, 2016). Nonetheless, the essence of the difference is basically due to a factor scale, whereas the behavior is basically the same for both methods, which is somehow in accordance with the literature.…”
Section: Analyses Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, by depending on the amplitude of the leakage magnetic field, the so developed eddy losses can become quite significant, which implies in loss of efficiency as well as in the occurrence of hot spots. Thus, although such these issues have been addressed and published for the steady-state operation of power transformers [1][2][3][4], the evaluation of the losses within these structural parts has not been equally diffused for the transient state, as in the case of inrush currents or GICs events. Moreover, the influence of power harmonics on these losses, as in the case of a transformer supplying a variable frequency driver (VFD) that is becoming more and more frequent has become a very significant issue for transformer designers to consider.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%