1999
DOI: 10.1007/s100529900181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental properties of gluon and quark jets from a point source

Abstract: Abstract. Gluon jets are identified in hadronic Z0 decays as all the particles in a hemisphere opposite to a hemisphere containing two tagged quark jets. Gluon jets defined in this manner are equivalent to gluon jets produced from a color singlet point source and thus correspond to the definition employed for most theoretical calculations. In a separate stage of the analysis, we select quark jets in a manner to correspond to calculations, as the particles in hemispheres of flavor tagged light quark (uds) event… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The γ-tagged jet FF in pp collisions is observed to be harder than the FF for inclusive jets at the same collision energy with p jet T in the range 80-110 GeV, coinciding with the peak of the γ-tagged p jet T distribution [47]. This is consistent with the two samples having different quark jet fractions, and with expectations from, for example, data from the Large Electron-Positron collider [51][52][53], where harder FFs for quark jets were observed compared with those for gluon jets. The pp data are also compared with generator distributions, which are typically compatible with the data at low to moderate values of z or p T within uncertainties.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…The γ-tagged jet FF in pp collisions is observed to be harder than the FF for inclusive jets at the same collision energy with p jet T in the range 80-110 GeV, coinciding with the peak of the γ-tagged p jet T distribution [47]. This is consistent with the two samples having different quark jet fractions, and with expectations from, for example, data from the Large Electron-Positron collider [51][52][53], where harder FFs for quark jets were observed compared with those for gluon jets. The pp data are also compared with generator distributions, which are typically compatible with the data at low to moderate values of z or p T within uncertainties.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…These results are in perfect agreement with what the Particle Data Group currently quotes as the world average, α (5) s (M Z ) = 0.1181 ± 0.002 [17]. Our strategy was to only include in our fits LEP1 and SLC data with both flavour separation and hadron identification [8][9][10], gluon-tagged three-jet samples with a fixed gluon-jet energy [11,12] and the π ± , K ± and p/ p datasets from the pre-LEP1/SLC era with the highest statistics and the finest binning in x [15]. Other data served us for cross checks.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The overall goodness of the NLO (LO) fit is given by χ 2 DF = 0.98 (0.97). The goodness of our fit may also be judged from figures 1(a) and (b), where our LO and NLO fit results are compared with the ALEPH [8,11], DELPHI [9], OPAL [12] and SLD [10] data. In figure 1(a), we study the differential cross section (1/σ tot ) dσ h /dx for π ± , K ± , p/ p and unidentified charged hadrons at √ s = 91.2 GeV, normalized to the total hadronic cross section σ tot , as a function of the scaled momentum x = 2p h / √ s. As in [9, 10], we assume that the sum of the π ± , K ± and p/ p data exhausts the full-charged-hadron data.…”
Section: Determination Of the Ffsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the jets fragment as in vacuum, but R D(z) differs from unity due to an increase in the fraction of quark jets in Pb+Pb collisions relative to pp collisions at a fixed p jet T . Since quark jets are more likely to produce high-z particles than gluon jets [53,54] this causes R D(z) > 1 at high z in the model predictions. The EQ model does not have a description of the soft processes from soft gluon radiation or the response of the hot QCD matter to the jet passing through it, so the comparison with data is only appropriate at z > 0.1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%