A nonhuman primate (NHP) model of acute, partial-body, high dose, irradiation with minimal (2.5%) bone marrow sparing (PBI/BM2.5) was used to assess the endogenous gastrointestinal and hematopoietic recovery and the ability of Neulasta ® (pegylated granulocyte colony stimulating factor [G-CSF]) or Neupogen ® (G-CSF) to enhance recovery from myelosuppression when administered at an increased interval between exposure and initiation of treatment. A secondary objective was to assess the effect of Neulasta ® or Neupogen ® on the mortality and morbidity due to the hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS) and concomitant acute gastrointestinal (GI)-ARS. NHP were exposed to 10.0 Gy 6 megavolt (MV) linear accelerator (LINAC)-derived photons delivered at 0.80 Gy min −1 . All NHP received subject-based medical management. NHP were dosed daily with control article (5% dextrose in water) initiated on day 1 post-exposure, or Neulasta ® (300 μg kg −1 ) administered on days 1 and 8 or days 3 and 10 post-exposure, or Neupogen ® (10 μg kg −1 ) administered daily post-exposure following its initiation on day 1 or day 3 until neutrophil recovery (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] ≥ 1,000 cells μL −1 for 3 consecutive days). Mortality in the irradiated-cohorts suggested that administration of Neulasta ® or Neupogen ® at either schedule did not affect mortality due to acute GI-ARS or mitigate mortality due to H-ARS (plus GI damage). Following 10.0 Gy PBI/BM2.5, the mean duration of neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 500 cells μL −1 ) was 22.4 days in the control cohort, versus 13.0 and 15.3 days in the Neulasta ® day 1-8 and day 3-10 cohorts relative to 16.2 and 17.4 days in the Neupogen ® cohorts initiated on day 1 and day 3, respectively. The absolute neutrophil count nadirs were 48 cells μL −1 in the controls, 117 cells μL −1 and 40 cells μL −1 in the Neulasta ® days 1, 8 and days 3, 10 cohorts, respectively, and 75 cells μL −1 , and 37 cells μL −1 in the Neupogen ® day 1 and day 3 cohorts, respectively. Therefore, the earlier administration of Neulasta ® or Neupogen ® was more effective in this model of marginal 2.5% BM sparing. The approximate 2.5% BM-sparing may approximate the threshold for efficacy of the lineage-specifc