2005
DOI: 10.1890/04-0939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Ramet Aggregation in the Clonal Plant Agrostis Stolonifera Reduces Its Competitive Ability

Abstract: Abstract. Spatial models predict that long-distance dispersal of offspring provides competitive superiority in open environments. We tested this prediction by artificially aggregating ramets of the spreading clonal species Agrostis stolonifera in an undisturbed environment and in an environment where flooding increased open space. We compared the competitive response of this manipulated Agrostis with both the natural ramet distribution of Agrostis and with the naturally aggregated clonal species Alopecurus pra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps the ability of a runner species to escape localized light competition by placing new ramets in areas of greater light availability facilitates this growth form's increase in relative abundance when soil N is no longer limiting. Clumping of ramets has been shown to reduce competitive ability under certain environmental conditions (Lenssen et al 2005), but this likely depends on the growth form of the competitors (Cheplick 1997) and thus is neighborhood dependent. Manipulative garden or pot experiments that have explicitly focused on competition between clonal growth forms are rarely repeated in the Weld (Callaghan et al 1992;Gough et al 2002), thus extrapolating to natural conditions remains diYcult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the ability of a runner species to escape localized light competition by placing new ramets in areas of greater light availability facilitates this growth form's increase in relative abundance when soil N is no longer limiting. Clumping of ramets has been shown to reduce competitive ability under certain environmental conditions (Lenssen et al 2005), but this likely depends on the growth form of the competitors (Cheplick 1997) and thus is neighborhood dependent. Manipulative garden or pot experiments that have explicitly focused on competition between clonal growth forms are rarely repeated in the Weld (Callaghan et al 1992;Gough et al 2002), thus extrapolating to natural conditions remains diYcult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these simulations were not spatially explicit. At the species-rather than genotypelevel, clonal growth form has been shown to affect competitiveness in a plant community, with ramet aggregation reducing the competitive ability of a clonal species in an open environment (Lenssen et al 2005). Clustering can also affect mating patterns in dioecious species (Charpentier 2002).…”
Section: Locusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the garden plots increased clonal spatial spread was a relatively efficient survival strategy, as the rhizomes broke through the hexagon of surrounding grasses and reached the circular edges of the plots which the more slowly expanding, dominant grasses had not colonized yet. Increased clonal spread in late-successional grasslands or in productive annuallymown meadows, however, is less useless if no gaps are created within a homogenous cover of competitive plants (Lenssen et al 2005), and C. dissectum is likely to become extinct in such dense grasslands.…”
Section: Clonal Growth Strategy Of C Dissectummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clonal growth by long stolons or rhizomes can be a successful life history strategy as runner production forms an effective way to exploit heterogeneous resources and to rapidly occupy space (Eriksson 1986;de Kroon and Schieving 1990;Lenssen et al 2005). However, runners are not a guarantee for high abundance in a landscape, since the percentage of rare species among plants with rhizomes longer than 10 cm is equal to that percentage for other types of clonal growth (Klimeš and Klimešová 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%