2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.101650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental research of single-hole and multi-hole orifice gas flow meters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between single-hole and multi-hole orifices with the same contraction coefficient are marginal. This can be due to the absence of a central hole in the multi-hole orifices that, according to results reported by Đurđević et al [ 5 ], can significantly decrease the value of pressure loss coefficient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The differences between single-hole and multi-hole orifices with the same contraction coefficient are marginal. This can be due to the absence of a central hole in the multi-hole orifices that, according to results reported by Đurđević et al [ 5 ], can significantly decrease the value of pressure loss coefficient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Nevertheless, they did not examine the exact geometries as presented in this paper. Đurđević et al [ 5 , 7 ] observed lower pressure loss coefficients for multi-hole orifice flowmeters but the orifices were distributed closer to the orifice center or there was an additional central hole, which probably made the pressure drop smaller. Özahi et al [ 12 ] investigated the impact of contraction coefficient on pressure loss coefficient in perforated plates and proposed a simple correlation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations