2015
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental resource pulses influence social-network dynamics and the potential for information flow in tool-using crows

Abstract: Social-network dynamics have profound consequences for biological processes such as information flow, but are notoriously difficult to measure in the wild. We used novel transceiver technology to chart association patterns across 19 days in a wild population of the New Caledonian crow—a tool-using species that may socially learn, and culturally accumulate, tool-related information. To examine the causes and consequences of changing network topology, we manipulated the environmental availability of the crows' p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, social dynamics in the wild could constrain crows' learning. Indeed, New Caledonian crows live in extended family groups (St Clair et al, 2015;Holzhaider et al, 2011) and there is evidence that they come into close proximity with neighboring groups when resources are abundant, though the nature of these interactions is unknown (Rutz et al, 2012;St Clair et al, 2015). The context specific effect we identify in our experiment could also play a role in maintaining family specific tool Blineages^: though family groups can interact, crows are likely to form a template of tools and/or counterparts they have had more exposure to (i.e., the tools of those with whom they most frequently interact).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, social dynamics in the wild could constrain crows' learning. Indeed, New Caledonian crows live in extended family groups (St Clair et al, 2015;Holzhaider et al, 2011) and there is evidence that they come into close proximity with neighboring groups when resources are abundant, though the nature of these interactions is unknown (Rutz et al, 2012;St Clair et al, 2015). The context specific effect we identify in our experiment could also play a role in maintaining family specific tool Blineages^: though family groups can interact, crows are likely to form a template of tools and/or counterparts they have had more exposure to (i.e., the tools of those with whom they most frequently interact).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were collected via 45 basestations deployed in the study area. We have provided a full description of our field procedures elsewhere [15,23].…”
Section: Field Deploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…240,000 encounter logs, with all 33 crows participating in at least one association. The encounters analysed (both here and in [15]) were restricted to those recorded between sunrise and sunset only, which constituted a sample of ca. 177,000 logs.…”
Section: Preliminary Data Processing and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations