2020
DOI: 10.3390/jmse8110872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Scours by Impinging Twin-Propeller Jets at Quay Wall

Abstract: Experiments were conducted to investigate the seabed scour holes due to the interaction between the twin-propeller jet and quay wall. Vertical quay wall was modelled by using a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic plate in a water tank. The relationship between the positions of the propeller and the vertical quay wall was designed according to the actual working conditions of a ship entering and leaving a port. Propeller-to-wall distance and rotational speed were changed to observe the various scour conditions. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, considering a no-scour threshold at X w = 7D p in their experiments, performed over a sandy bed of d 50 = 0.2mm and with a twin-propeller of D p = 55mm rotating at 500rpm, the obtained wall Froude number is Fr w = 0.24. This result is slightly below the threshold obtained in this article, probably due to the slightly lesser sediment diameter used by Cui et al (2020b) in comparison with the present study. This difference points to a partial agreement and to the need to consider different sediment diameters to obtain a clear threshold of the wall Froude number to prevent scour over non-protected beds in case of confined twin propeller jets.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, considering a no-scour threshold at X w = 7D p in their experiments, performed over a sandy bed of d 50 = 0.2mm and with a twin-propeller of D p = 55mm rotating at 500rpm, the obtained wall Froude number is Fr w = 0.24. This result is slightly below the threshold obtained in this article, probably due to the slightly lesser sediment diameter used by Cui et al (2020b) in comparison with the present study. This difference points to a partial agreement and to the need to consider different sediment diameters to obtain a clear threshold of the wall Froude number to prevent scour over non-protected beds in case of confined twin propeller jets.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…This threshold is found at Fr w ≈ 0.25. In the same line, Cui et al (2020b) reported no scour near the quay wall in the test experiments at X w = 9D p , although with wall clearance of X w = 7D p scour was visible. Therefore, considering a no-scour threshold at X w = 7D p in their experiments, performed over a sandy bed of d 50 = 0.2mm and with a twin-propeller of D p = 55mm rotating at 500rpm, the obtained wall Froude number is Fr w = 0.24.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, core samples are extracted from the concrete structures to evaluate the reasons for deterioration and estimate the remaining service life. 32,33 Other major factors urging for frequent assessments of INS are as follows: (i) changing weather patterns causing floods and droughts, 34 (ii) a rise in extreme weather events like storm surges 35 , and (iii) an increase in the inland water traffic and size of vessels, 36 which may causes misuse of the navigation structures. These factors compromise the integrity of INS and their service life.…”
Section: Issues and Concerns With Insmentioning
confidence: 99%