2018
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental seismic performance evaluation of modular lightweight steel buildings within the ELISSA project

Abstract: Summary Lightweight steel buildings made up by cold‐formed steel (CFS) members as main structural components are growing in popularity in the most industrialized countries. Cold‐formed steel buildings start to be adopted also in seismic regions thanks to their efficient fabrication, reduced site work, short time of construction, and good structural performance. However, the dynamic properties and full seismic performance of CFS buildings completed with finishing is an open question. This paper attempts to prov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mechanism is clearly due to the loading set up. Indeed, while in previous research [4,[7][8][9] the in plane load is applied to CFS walls through a spreading beam located on the top of the CFS walls, in the presented research, since the BS EN 594 has been followed, no spreading beam has been included. The results demonstrate that, despite the BS EN 594 is required in UK to be followed for the testing of CFS walls, appropriate improvement of the test set up is required to be able to capture the full shear capacity of CFS walls sheathed with OSB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mechanism is clearly due to the loading set up. Indeed, while in previous research [4,[7][8][9] the in plane load is applied to CFS walls through a spreading beam located on the top of the CFS walls, in the presented research, since the BS EN 594 has been followed, no spreading beam has been included. The results demonstrate that, despite the BS EN 594 is required in UK to be followed for the testing of CFS walls, appropriate improvement of the test set up is required to be able to capture the full shear capacity of CFS walls sheathed with OSB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first four days were used for preparing the installation of the ground floor to the shaking table. This part was delicate for this specific cases, since the ELISSA mock up needed to be tested on shaking table (Landolfo et al 2018) under seismic loading. The mock up, as indicated in Section 2 has plan dimensions of 4.5 x 2.5m, while the shaking table had dimensions of 3x3m.…”
Section: Construction and Deconstruction Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The B and C wall Configurations were representative of the shear walls used in the B and C mock-up Configurations, respectively. More details about the research project are available in Landolfo et al [19].…”
Section: Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%