2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2017.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental simulation of crude oil-water partitioning behavior of BTEX compounds during a deep submarine oil spill

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smallest relative diameter reported was 0.92 ± 0.01, leading to V dead oil = 0.779 ± 0.025; this value is consistent with TAMOC predictions for experiments 1–9 (0.80–0.82). f Simulated value at the end of the experiment of Pesch et al g This result is based on two Peng–Robinson equation-of-state (PR EOS) calculations of methane-saturated live oil at 20 °C and 151 and 1.01325 bar, respectively. Based on the first of these calculations, the initial methane content in the live oil at the beginning of the experiment of Pesch et al was estimated to be 56.9 kg m –3 , which is reasonably close to the 42.3 kg m –3 assumed by Pesch et al based on laboratory data by Jaggi et al for a similar light oil (methane-saturated Macondo dead oil). The second PR EOS calculation provided the gas and oil volumes after the mixture was brought to 1.01325 bar. h This value was estimated as the calculated quantity of methane needed to reach the observed d P / d P,0 value at the last measurement in the experiment, based on a TAMOC gas–oil equilibrium calculation at 1.0 bar and 20 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The smallest relative diameter reported was 0.92 ± 0.01, leading to V dead oil = 0.779 ± 0.025; this value is consistent with TAMOC predictions for experiments 1–9 (0.80–0.82). f Simulated value at the end of the experiment of Pesch et al g This result is based on two Peng–Robinson equation-of-state (PR EOS) calculations of methane-saturated live oil at 20 °C and 151 and 1.01325 bar, respectively. Based on the first of these calculations, the initial methane content in the live oil at the beginning of the experiment of Pesch et al was estimated to be 56.9 kg m –3 , which is reasonably close to the 42.3 kg m –3 assumed by Pesch et al based on laboratory data by Jaggi et al for a similar light oil (methane-saturated Macondo dead oil). The second PR EOS calculation provided the gas and oil volumes after the mixture was brought to 1.01325 bar. h This value was estimated as the calculated quantity of methane needed to reach the observed d P / d P,0 value at the last measurement in the experiment, based on a TAMOC gas–oil equilibrium calculation at 1.0 bar and 20 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…f Simulated value at the end of the experiment of Pesch et al 23 g This result is based on two Peng− Robinson equation-of-state (PR EOS) calculations of methane-saturated live oil at 20 °C and 151 and 1.01325 bar, respectively. Based on the first of these calculations, the initial methane content in the live oil at the beginning of the experiment of Pesch et al 23 was estimated to be 56.9 kg m −3 , which is reasonably close to the 42.3 kg m −3 assumed by Pesch et al 23 based on laboratory data by Jaggi et al 76 for a similar light oil (methanesaturated Macondo dead oil). The second PR EOS calculation provided the gas and oil volumes after the mixture was brought to 1.01325 bar.…”
Section: ■ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To help resolve the issues of droplet size formation with and without SSDI, and to determine partitioning of oil into its constituents, GoMRI supported the development of high-pressure jet modules and other experimental set-ups (e.g., Figure 5; Jaggi et al, 2017;Malone et al, 2018;Pesch et al, 2018Pesch et al, , 2020. Importantly, these experiments included the use of methane-saturated surrogate oils to evaluate the dynamic processes associated with the physical and chemical mechanisms present in an uncontrolled blowout.…”
Section: Subsurface Dispersant Injection (Ssdi) Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements in the time-varying estimation of initial droplet size distribution as live oil rises from the buoyant plume into the far-field water column will likely result in the next breakthrough. These estimates should be based on our understanding of multiphase and pressuredrop processes on the gas portion of the gas-saturated droplets (Griffiths, 2012;Socolosky et al, 2016;Vaz et al, 2020;Malone et al, 2020;Faillettaz et al, 2021), their evolution through partitioning and degassing during oil ascent in the water column (Gros et al, 2016;Jaggi et al, 2017Jaggi et al, , 2020Pesch et al, 2018) and biodegradation (Joye et al, 2016b), and on the acquired knowledge of the effect of subsea dispersant injection (Paris et al, 2012(Paris et al, , 2018French-McCay et al, 2019).…”
Section: Near-field Processes: Plume Formation and Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%