2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2015.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental simulation of high temperature sliding contact of hot rolled steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. Different types of steel abrasive wear rate values for different temperatures [20] Similar results can be found in other researches. As it described in [6], even a one cycle heating to 850 °C and cooling to the room temperature leads to a decrease of the fatigue strength.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3. Different types of steel abrasive wear rate values for different temperatures [20] Similar results can be found in other researches. As it described in [6], even a one cycle heating to 850 °C and cooling to the room temperature leads to a decrease of the fatigue strength.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This is confirmed by many experimental studies in the field of materials science. Results of such experiments described in [19][20][21] are similar: with an increase of the contact temperature, the mass loss of all the tested steels also increases. However, some types of steels are able to form a tribological layer in an abrasive medium, which increases wear resistance, even at high temperatures (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…19 worn surface and intermixed with abrasives or oxides at elevated temperatures, which can be beneficial due to the presence of additional hard phases at the surface [39,63].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), also the probable temperature distribution can be derived, giving an image of the highest stressed zones within the wear gap. The temperature induced softening is assumed to impair the mechanical properties of the steel and impedes wear resistance .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For HM1 $30% of the particles are ≤2 μm, for HM2 the percentage is 57% as verified by quantitative image analysis (QWIN ® software). HM1 is definitely coarser with 37% of the particles ≥5 μm, while this percentage is 9% for HM2 [27]. The compound hardness of HM1 is $1,005 HV10 and of HM2 $1,160 HV10.…”
Section: Tool Materials Investigatedmentioning
confidence: 92%