2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1528898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental studies of peptide bonds: Identification of the C7eq conformation of the alanine dipeptide analog N-acetyl-alanine N′-methylamide from torsion-rotation interactions

Abstract: Rotational spectra of the biomimetic molecule, alanine dipeptide and the double N15(N215) isotopomer have been observed using a pulsed-molecular-beam Fourier transform microwave spectrometer. The spectra reveal tunneling splittings from the torsional mode structure of two of its three methyl rotors. The torsional states assigned include one AA-state and two AE-states (i.e., AE and EA) for each isotopomer. The AA-states are well-fit to A-reduction asymmetricrotor Hamiltonians. The “infinite-barrier-limit” rotat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent experimental results suggest that the backbone preferences in proteins are already present in blocked aminoacids. 55,56 A number of experimental 55,[57][58][59][60] and theoretical, [61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] studies indicate that the potential energy surface for AD in vacuum and in solution are considerably different: While in the gas-phase the global minimum is believed to be a C7 eq structure (ϕ− 83°, ψ~73°), 70 interaction with water favors the polyproline-II (P II , (ϕ~−75°, ψ~150°) conformation. 60 AD has also been used previously to investigate the performance of the SCC-DFTB method as compared to different classical force fields.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent experimental results suggest that the backbone preferences in proteins are already present in blocked aminoacids. 55,56 A number of experimental 55,[57][58][59][60] and theoretical, [61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] studies indicate that the potential energy surface for AD in vacuum and in solution are considerably different: While in the gas-phase the global minimum is believed to be a C7 eq structure (ϕ− 83°, ψ~73°), 70 interaction with water favors the polyproline-II (P II , (ϕ~−75°, ψ~150°) conformation. 60 AD has also been used previously to investigate the performance of the SCC-DFTB method as compared to different classical force fields.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Therefore, it is particularly well suited for studying dipeptides containing amino acids as relevant as glycine, alanine or proline, elusive to IR/UV double resonance experiments. Lavrich et al 6 investigated the alanine dipeptide N-acetyl-alanine N 0 -methylamide (Ac-Ala-NHMe) and observed only a C eq 7 conformation using heating methods to bring molecules into the gas phase. Very recently, the combination of FTMW spectroscopic techniques with laser ablation methods [7][8][9][10] has been successfully applied in the investigation of the conformational preferences of isolated protected dipeptides such as N-acetyl-glycinamide (Ac-Gly-NH 2 ), 11 N-acetyl-alaninamide (Ac-Ala-NH 2 ) 12 and N-acetyl-prolinamide (Ac-Pro-NH 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second set of favorable configurations includes a hydrogen bond linking the carbonyl or amide groups of the peptide bond to the hydroxyl group, acting as either proton donor or acceptor. This seven membered ring is similar to the lowest energy form reported for N-acetylalanine-N 0 -methyl amide (Alanine Dipeptide) [25]. Two additional constraints further simplify the possible geometries of Nacetylglycine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…6 06 ) 5 05 11007.307(4) )1 6 15 ) 5 14 11557.311(4) 0 5 23 ) 5 14 12343.041(4) )2 7 17 ) 6 16 12421.876(4) 1 5 15 ) 4 04 12625.871(4) )2 7 07 ) 6 06 12788.466(4) )2 7 26 ) 6 25 12965.032(4) )1 7 34 ) 6 33 13030.307(4) )1 2 20 ) 2 11 13100.450(4) 2 7 25 ) 6 24 13171.221(4) 1 7 16 ) 6 15 13467.149(4) )2 3 22 ) 3 13 13775.838(4) 1 9 09 ) 8 18 13954.651(4) )1 6 16 ) 5 05 14077.784(4) 0 8 18 ) 7 17 14180.425(4) 1 8 08 ) 7 07 14549.057(4) 1 8 27 ) 7 26 14804.498(4) 1 8 36 ) 7 35 14889.506(4) )4 8 35 ) 7 34 14904.651(4) 1 6 25 ) 6 16 14927.681(4) 0 8 26 ) 7 25 15106.296(4) 0 8 17 ) 7 16 15368.561(4) )1 7 17 ) 6 06 15492.352(4) 2 9 19 ) 8 18 15933.652(4) )1 10 0;10 ) 9 19 16034.386(4) 1 9 09 ) 8 08 16289.905(4) 1 9 28 ) 8 27 16638.941(4) 2 2 21 ) 1 10 16959.839(4) 1 9 27 ) 8 26 17055.888(4) 4 2 20 ) 1 11 17114.071(4) )2 9 18 ) 8 17 17259.735(4) 1 10 1;10 ) 9 19 17681.499(4) 1 10 0;10 ) 9 09 18013.388(4) 1 10 3;8 ) 9 37 18627.156(4) 3 3 22 ) 2 11 18665.808(4) )1 10 3;7 ) 9 36 18674.055(4) )2 3 21 ) 2 12 19136.137(4) 1 10 19 ) 9 18 19138.649(4) )2 11 1;11 ) 10 1;10 19424.048(4) 0 11 0;11 ) 10 0;10 19723.023(4) 1 11 1;10 ) 10 19 21003.123(4) )1 12 0;12 ) 11 0;11 21422.817(4) 0 13 0;13 ) 12 0;12 23116.594(4) )1 r (A-state) 1.7 a The expanded uncertainties shown in parentheses are Type B with coverage factor k ¼ 2 or two standard deviations [21]. intramolecular hydrogen bond.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified