2008
DOI: 10.2514/1.32231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Studies of Pylon-Aided Fuel Injection into a Supersonic Crossflow

Abstract: The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headqu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting displacement in the tunnel cross-sectional area by this geometry (see Table 3) was equivalent to an 8.5 deg constant-angle ramp for the same footprint area as the base of the fin or a 0.7 deg ramp if the entire span of the wind-tunnel test section was considered. Finally, the size of the orifice and fin was significantly larger in scale compared to other similar injectors and pylons reported in the literature [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] to obtain larger and more detailed visualizations of the jet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The resulting displacement in the tunnel cross-sectional area by this geometry (see Table 3) was equivalent to an 8.5 deg constant-angle ramp for the same footprint area as the base of the fin or a 0.7 deg ramp if the entire span of the wind-tunnel test section was considered. Finally, the size of the orifice and fin was significantly larger in scale compared to other similar injectors and pylons reported in the literature [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] to obtain larger and more detailed visualizations of the jet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Injection in inlet or isolator also enhances mixing, flame stability and combustion efficiency. In an experimental study by Gruber et al [35] three pylon geometries are compared with 7 no Pylon case having a cavity based flame holder downstream. In all cases presence of pylon result in increased fuel penetration, removed the injectant remain near wall compared with no pylon case and it is also observed that pressure loss were not significantly influenced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many mixing enhancement devices have been proposed in recent years, including transverse jet (Lee and Mitani, 2003;Huang et al, 2012b;2012c), ramp (Alexander et al, 2006;Huang et al, 2013b), strut (Huang et al, 2011c;Sujith et al, 2013), pylon (Gruenig et al, 2000;Gruber et al, 2008;Takahashi et al, 2010;Lee, 2012;Pohlman and Greendyke, 2013), and cavity (Yu and Schadow, 1994;Huang et al, 2012a;2013a), as well as double cavities in parallel or tandem (Huang et al, 2011b) and some combinations (Hsu et al, 2010;Grady et al, 2012). These devices can provide an axial vortex which has been proved to be responsible for improving mixing in supersonic flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%