2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0883-2927(01)00115-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study and modeling of the sorption of uranium(VI) onto olivine-rock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the concept of the ''Generalised Composite Approach" (Davis et al, 1998;Davis et al, 2004), we merged these sites into a single generic site because it would not appear feasible to quantify or characterize the specific site types for a complex rock such as basalt. The approximation of considering only one generic >SOH site was also made by Wanner et al (1994), Sverjensky and Sahai (1996) and El Aamrani et al (2002) in studies dealing with complex silicate mineral surfaces. For the generic site, we determined only REE sorption constants.…”
Section: Surface Complexation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the concept of the ''Generalised Composite Approach" (Davis et al, 1998;Davis et al, 2004), we merged these sites into a single generic site because it would not appear feasible to quantify or characterize the specific site types for a complex rock such as basalt. The approximation of considering only one generic >SOH site was also made by Wanner et al (1994), Sverjensky and Sahai (1996) and El Aamrani et al (2002) in studies dealing with complex silicate mineral surfaces. For the generic site, we determined only REE sorption constants.…”
Section: Surface Complexation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches have been used to model whole-rock or bulk sediment sorption processes. El Aamrani et al (2002), Barnett et al (2002), Davis et al (2004) and Payne et al (2004) interpreted sorption data of Uranium VI by olivine rock, different American soils, an aquifer sediment and a weathered shale, using either (1) the component additivity model (CA) or (2) the Generalised Composite model (GC). These two approaches were described in detail by Davis et al (1998) and Davis et al (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sorption studies with U(VI) typically demonstrate that it has low affinity for zeolites at high pH (9-11)-particularly in the presence of elevated inorganic carbon. 23,24,25,26 This is because the higher levels of dissolved inorganic carbon favor the formation of negatively-charged, highly soluble U(VI)-carbonate complexes, which have low affinities for similarly-charged surfaces. Few sorption studies have been done with U and zeolites above pH 12.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical and physical methods, including excavation and soil capping [21,22], pump and treat technologies [23,24], mineral adsorption [25][26][27], mineral precipitation [28,29], complexation [30][31][32], adsorption to permeable zero-valent iron and hydroxyapatite reactive barriers [33][34][35], cement solidification [36,37], and vitrification [38,39], have all demonstrated efficacy in mitigating contaminant transport in situ. Remediation methods that depend upon chemical transformations for in situ sequestration of contaminants must first consider local geochemical parameters that include local geology, concentrations of soluble anions and cations, pH, and redox state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%