2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2007.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study and modeling on liquid dispersion in external-loop airlift slurry reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
10
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only in the regime III where a gas recirculation exists (Heijnen et al, 1997), the gas holdup both in the riser and the downcomer can be promoted with the increase of h tc (Kilonzo et al, 2006(Kilonzo et al, , 2007. This is why an increase of gas voidage was observed in IALR with the increase of top clearance (Chisti, 1989;Kilonzo et al, 2006Kilonzo et al, , 2007 and an opposite phenomenon is seen in this work and other publications (Lazarova et al, 1997;Liu et al, 2008;Lu et al, 1994).…”
Section: Hydrodynamicssupporting
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only in the regime III where a gas recirculation exists (Heijnen et al, 1997), the gas holdup both in the riser and the downcomer can be promoted with the increase of h tc (Kilonzo et al, 2006(Kilonzo et al, , 2007. This is why an increase of gas voidage was observed in IALR with the increase of top clearance (Chisti, 1989;Kilonzo et al, 2006Kilonzo et al, , 2007 and an opposite phenomenon is seen in this work and other publications (Lazarova et al, 1997;Liu et al, 2008;Lu et al, 1994).…”
Section: Hydrodynamicssupporting
confidence: 46%
“…Couvert et al (1999) argued that the top clearance has negligible effect on the gas holdup. Lazarova et al (1997), Liu et al (2008) and Lu et al (1994) stated that the gas voidage decreases with the increase of top clearance, while Chisti (1989), Kilonzo et al (2006) and Kilonzo et al (2007) drew a completely opposite conclusion. However, no further explanation has been made on it so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The increase in gas flow rate resulted in the formation of a larger number of bubbles, which in return led to higher gas holdup. The same observation was reported previously by Yazdian et al , Liu et al , Mohanty et al and Han et al Fig. also shows that the gas holdup in the riser increased with decrease in the liquid static height in the bioreactor.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…also shows that the gas holdup in the riser increased with decrease in the liquid static height in the bioreactor. The effect of liquid height on gas holdup in the external recirculating airlift bioreactors was investigated previously by different researchers , . Apparently, with decreasing liquid height in the bioreactor, the flow resistance in the upper connecting tube is increased.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A review of literature reveals that considerable work has been carried out on the measurement of external liquid circulations through a downcomer (Mohanty et al, 2006; Liu et al, 2008; Yazdian et al, 2009). However, the influence of axial liquid velocity profiles in the riser cannot be neglected mainly because it governs several key parameters in the design of ELAR, for example, gas–liquid effective interfacial area, rate of mass transfer, extent of liquid‐phase mixing and the rate of heat transfer at the wall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%