2012
DOI: 10.1002/pen.23076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study for starve‐fed single screw extrusion of thermoplastics

Abstract: An experimental study of the polymer behavior in a starve‐fed single screw extrusion is presented. Various polymeric materials, semicrystalline low density polyethylene (LDPE), polypropylene (PP), and (LDPE/PS) polyblends were investigated at various operating conditions. A “screw pulling‐out” technique was used to study polymer behavior along the screw. The solid conveying, melting position, the extent of starvation, and the fully filled regions were observed. Polymer samples were stripped off from the screw … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
52
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
52
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficients suggest that screw speed (B) is the most significant effect on mass output, consistent with Borgaonkar et al 32 and with predictions from the melt pumping analysis in single screw extrusion, consisting of laminar shear flow due to drag forces induced by screw rotation [2][3][4] . Figure 3 is a typical Output versus Pressure (Q/P) diagram derived from basic theoretical considerations, which illustrates the effects of rotational screw speed (N B > N A ) consistent with the dominating effect of this variable predicted in Equation (8). This figure also implies that at a given screw speed there will be only a relatively small change in the operation viscosity, as reported elsewhere 1 .…”
Section: Extruder Mass Output (̇)supporting
confidence: 76%
“…The coefficients suggest that screw speed (B) is the most significant effect on mass output, consistent with Borgaonkar et al 32 and with predictions from the melt pumping analysis in single screw extrusion, consisting of laminar shear flow due to drag forces induced by screw rotation [2][3][4] . Figure 3 is a typical Output versus Pressure (Q/P) diagram derived from basic theoretical considerations, which illustrates the effects of rotational screw speed (N B > N A ) consistent with the dominating effect of this variable predicted in Equation (8). This figure also implies that at a given screw speed there will be only a relatively small change in the operation viscosity, as reported elsewhere 1 .…”
Section: Extruder Mass Output (̇)supporting
confidence: 76%
“…As starve feeding usually improves mixing and melting capacities of the extruder, this way of feeding has been applied for single-screw extruders. [1,2,[11][12][13][14] These studies have been discussed by Wilczyński et al [15] General review on modeling of polymer extrusion has been presented elsewhere. Tadmor et al [4][5][6] first developed a mathematical model of fusion of polymers in single-screw extruders, and later a composite model of the process that includes polymer solid conveying, polymer fusion and polymer melt conveying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Flood fed single-screw extrusion is generally well understood, and the literature is very rich here. [16][17][18][19] Wilczyński et al [15,20,21] first developed a mathematical model of fusion of polymers in starve fed single-screw extruders, and subsequently a composite model of the process, first for conventional screws, and later for non-conventional screws. [7][8][9][10] Starve fed extrusion process is much less known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composite model we propose is based on our previous experimental observations which are summarized in Fig. .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Melting mechanisms in single screw extruders: (a) flood fed extrusion (of PP at the screw speed N = 50 rpm and flood feed rate GFF = 12.85 kg/h), (b) starve fed extrusion (of PP at the screw speed N = 50 rpm and metered feed rate GSF = 90% GFF = 11.56 kg/h) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%