2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2019.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study of a Command Governor Adaptive Depth Controller for an Unmanned Underwater Vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T is the full state vector of the system. The matrices A ′ ∈ R n×n , b ∈ R n×m , c ∈ R p×n in (19), and the rest of the parameters are defined as before in (4). By writing (19) in the state space form, the matrices A, B and C in (4) can be defined as…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…T is the full state vector of the system. The matrices A ′ ∈ R n×n , b ∈ R n×m , c ∈ R p×n in (19), and the rest of the parameters are defined as before in (4). By writing (19) in the state space form, the matrices A, B and C in (4) can be defined as…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the hazardous environments that human being has not been able to discover effectively is the deep see and ocean surfaces. The underwater robots have been proven a useful technology to explore and investigate such inaccessible environments 4,5 . Moreover, in nuclear applications underwater robots have shown a great potential for inspection and monitoring of the environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lin et al [8] designed an adaptive fuzzy stabilization controller for an underactuated surface vessel in the presence of unknown time-varying environmental disturbances and input saturation. Makavita et al [9] reported the results of an experimental study conducted to compare the performances of different adaptive control methods for the depth control of a UUV, which represents a significant challenge compared with heading control due to increased noise, time delay, and thrust requirements. Bui and Kim [10] used an FLC method that enabled AUVs to navigate safely through obstacles to a goal, with the optimal path proven by their simulation results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we used the approach in an experiment with multiple obstacles in a real environment. (8) and (9), the cost function values of the destination and obstacle were negative and positive, respectively. Therefore, the sum of the cost function values from Equation (7) was negative, which meant that no obstacles were present inside the range of the scanning sonar, and the ROV traveled toward the destination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%