Experimental study of aerodynamic noise vs drag relationships for circular cylinders

Revell, J. D.; Prydz, R. A.; Hays, Andrew

doi:10.2514/6.1977-1292

Cited by 25 publications

(44 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…LES Orselli et al [22] 0.191 1.08 [22] 0.191 1.08 † Experimentally the d C = 1.312 (for smooth cylinder) and d C = 0.943 (for rough cylinder) when the M = 0.2 and Re = 8.9 × 10 4 [29].…”

Section: Dmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this study, the importance of capturing the quasi-2D flow mechanisms is evaluated. The far-field noise is computed based on the 2D near-field flow data, and the corresponding acoustic results are validated with the experimental data of Revell et al [29]. The receiver is located at 128D away from the center of the cylinder and perpendicular to the flow direction.…”

mentioning

confidence: 92%

“…To predict the far-field noise from the 2D near-field flow data, the effect of the third dimension can be compensated by assigning a source correlation length (SCL) [25][26][27][28].The experimental investigations of flow past a circular cylinder conducted by Revell et al[29] were widely used as a benchmark validation of the hybrid CAA methods. Many studies showed that different correlation lengths were obtained in accordance with the Reynolds numbers (Re) based on the cylinder diameter [24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. At low Re, Morkovin [24] observed that the flow was homogeneous along the spanwise direction with a correlation length around 15 to 18 times the circular diameter.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The receiver is located at 128D away from the center of the cylinder and perpendicular to the flow direction. The SCL is assumed based on the experimental observations from previous studies [21,29]. The mesh sensitivity study is carried out by changing the maximum face size for the computational domain.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[29] were widely used as a benchmark validation of the hybrid CAA methods. Many studies showed that different correlation lengths were obtained in accordance with the Reynolds numbers (Re) based on the cylinder diameter [24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. At low Re, Morkovin [24] observed that the flow was homogeneous along the spanwise direction with a correlation length around 15 to 18 times the circular diameter.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Predicting Far-Field Noise Generated by a Landing Gear Using Multiple Two-Dimensional Simulations

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Featured Application: Far-field noise prediction of flow past complex multi-component structures. Abstract: In this paper, a new approach is proposed to predict the far-field noise of a landing gear (LG) based on near-field flow data obtained from multiple two-dimensional (2D) simulations. The LG consists of many bluff bodies with various shapes and sizes. The analysis begins with dividing the LG structure into multiple 2D cross-sections (C-Ss) representing different configurations. The C-Ss locations are selected based on the number of components, sizes, and geometric complexities. The 2D Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis for each C-S is carried out first to obtain the acoustic source data. The Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings acoustic analogy (FW-H) is then used to predict the far-field noise. To compensate for the third dimension, a source correlation length (SCL) is assumed based on a perfectly correlated flow. The overall noise of the LG is calculated as the incoherent sum of the predicted noise from all C-Ss. Flow over a circular cylinder is then studied to examine the effect of the 2D CFD results on the predicted noise. The results are in good agreement with reported experimental and numerical data. However, the Strouhal number (St) is over-predicted. The proposed approach provides a reasonable estimation of the LG far-field noise at a low computational cost. Thus, it has the potential to be used as a quick tool to predict the far-field noise from an LG during the design stage.The direct numerical simulation (DNS) of complex three-dimensional (3D) aircraft systems, such as the LGs, is computationally expensive. This is because the 3D model needs high spatial and temporal resolutions to resolve the wide range of energy and length scales between the flow and acoustic fields. Therefore, an efficient two-step hybrid computational aeroacoustics (CAA) approach was proposed, where the flow and the acoustic fields are computed using two independent solvers [8]. In the last decade, noise generated due to flow past a simplified LG geometry has been extensively investigated using hybrid CAA approaches. The numerical results were validated with experiments through benchmark problems for airframe noise computations (BANC) workshops [10][11][12][13][14]. The BANC workshops focus on improving the far-field noise prediction accuracy of the 3D simulations and reducing the computation time. There are a few semi-empirical tools developed to facilitate the noise prediction of the LG during the design stage [3,7]. Among these, the Landing Gear Model and Acoustic Prediction tool (LGMAP) has been developed for a quick noise estimate of the LG [15]. However, lower fidelity approaches are essential to predict the flow and acoustic quantities with better computational efficiency and reasonable accuracy.The two-dimensional (2D) Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis provides a faster way to predict the near-field data. A few studies investigated the validity of the 2D simulations to predict the far-field noise of the flow...

show abstract

“…LES Orselli et al [22] 0.191 1.08 [22] 0.191 1.08 † Experimentally the d C = 1.312 (for smooth cylinder) and d C = 0.943 (for rough cylinder) when the M = 0.2 and Re = 8.9 × 10 4 [29].…”

Section: Dmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 92%