2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-017-1493-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of chemical mechanical polishing of the final surfaces of cemented carbide inserts for effective cutting austenitic stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method mainly relies on the mechanical action of abrasive particles and the chemical action of oxidants in a polishing slurry to make the surface of a polished workpiece flat and smooth, which has the advantages of no surface/subsurface damage, low density of surface defects, and low cost [ 14 ]. Moreover, CMP technology has been employed for polishing the rake faces of carbide inserts, and it has been found that this method can improve the surface quality and cutting performance of an insert [ 15 , 16 ]. In addition, Qin et al [ 17 ] investigated the material removal mechanism of the chemical mechanical polishing of a carbide insert and established a material removal model for the chemical mechanical polishing of a carbide insert.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method mainly relies on the mechanical action of abrasive particles and the chemical action of oxidants in a polishing slurry to make the surface of a polished workpiece flat and smooth, which has the advantages of no surface/subsurface damage, low density of surface defects, and low cost [ 14 ]. Moreover, CMP technology has been employed for polishing the rake faces of carbide inserts, and it has been found that this method can improve the surface quality and cutting performance of an insert [ 15 , 16 ]. In addition, Qin et al [ 17 ] investigated the material removal mechanism of the chemical mechanical polishing of a carbide insert and established a material removal model for the chemical mechanical polishing of a carbide insert.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, great cutting force and high cutting temperature were produced in the machining of stainless steel due to its high strength and hardness at high temperature, high plasticity, high toughness and low thermal conductivity [3]. The cutting process is unstable, workhardening is serious and tools are prone to adhesive wear during machining austenitic stainless steel [4][5][6]. Therefore, austenitic stainless steel is a kind of typical difficult-to-cut material, the relative machinability is only 30%∼50% of 45 steel [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has usually been used as a surface precision polishing method for various materials such as copper, aluminum, and tungsten as well as their alloys. [2][3][4] However, the chemical activity of aluminum is stronger than zinc. The metal zinc and aluminum standard electrode potential difference (the standard electrode potential difference of Zn/Zn 2+ is −0.763 V, and the Al/Al 3+ standard electrode potential difference of −1.663 V) is large.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%