1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf00616757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of copper deposition in a fluidized bed electrode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by the work of Hutin and Coeuret [27] and Doherty et al [35] who noted that the penetration depth of the current is limited by ohmic loss in the electrolyte. It was concluded that in order to achieve a maximum deposition rate per unit volume, the electrode should be no deeper than the penetration depth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is supported by the work of Hutin and Coeuret [27] and Doherty et al [35] who noted that the penetration depth of the current is limited by ohmic loss in the electrolyte. It was concluded that in order to achieve a maximum deposition rate per unit volume, the electrode should be no deeper than the penetration depth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Using a fluidized/fixed bed electrode system, Hutin and Coeuret [27] found that a thin bed behaved cathodically at every point, but that electrochemical activity increased rapidly with distance from the current feeder. For deeper beds, positive values of the overpotential, characterizing anodic behaviour, appeared in the distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the solid phase that composes the fluidized bed would have its conductivity reduced due to the lower shock probability between the particles, as previously discussed in the introduction section, bringing about a highly stepped overpotential profile and a strong hydrogen gas evolution favored by the very negative overpotentials in counter electrode surroundings; meanwhile, a great portion of the region close to the current feeder would present a low electrochemical activity, as mathematically predicted by phenomenological models by Doherty et al (1996) and recently by Thilakavathi et al (2012), and experimentally observed by Ruotolo and Gubulin (2005). Regions with anodic dissolution of the electrodeposited metal in a FBE were also experimentally confirmed by Hutin and Coeuret (1977). The raise on applied current, besides of diminishing inactive zones and anodic dissolution in electrode interiors (Ruotolo and Gubulin 2005), should be performed Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The greater the Dr the sharper the potential and current profile inside the porous electrode, being the more active zone close to the counter electrode. Since the increase of acid concentration can reduce Dr by increasing the solution conductivity, potential and current distribution inside the FBE will become more uniform, making the electrode more active in the zones close to the current feeder and avoiding very negative overpotentials responsible for the HER close to the counter electrode, consequently, the current efficiency increases, as experimentally observed for zinc (Lanza and Bertazzoli 2000) and copper (Ruotolo and Gubulin 2011) electrodeposition in a fixed bed electrode, for copper electrodeposition in a spouted bed electrode (Martins et al 2012), and also for FBEs (Hutin and Coeuret 1977), whose process was modeled and simulated by Thilakavathi et al (2009). Furthermore, considering that the solid-phase conductivity depends on the statistical probability of particle shocks (Gabrielli et al 1994), expansion also will have an influence on the solid-phase conductivity, thus it would be expected that increasing the FBE expansion the solid-phase conductivity dropped.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It has been found that in the direction normal to the current feeder, the active regions are near the current feeder as well as the membrane, and there exists an anodic region in which the potential of conductive particles is higher than that of the electrolyte phase, and the region will be enlarged by increasing bed expansions (13). This phenomenon arises from discontinuity of the particle phase, in which it cannot be regarded as equipotential any more.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%