1973
DOI: 10.1007/bf02116038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of current formation in direct-charge detectors with a rhodium emitter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculations and experiments have confirmed that such sensors make it possible to detect neutron flux fluctuations in a wide frequency range due to the instantaneous component of the current [2] that is due to the Compton effect. The instantaneous component of the current is proportional to the main (activation) component of the sensor current.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Calculations and experiments have confirmed that such sensors make it possible to detect neutron flux fluctuations in a wide frequency range due to the instantaneous component of the current [2] that is due to the Compton effect. The instantaneous component of the current is proportional to the main (activation) component of the sensor current.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…These SPNDs have a high sensitivity to neutrons, they also have excellent signal linearity, and their production technology is well developed. And yet, on the background of existing trends in increasing the radiation dose and operating temperature of the used in the core materials, the signal delay of the activation SPNDs and their relatively short service life [7][8][9][10] put the question: is it enough to use only inertial detectors from the point of the safety view?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) for reasons of safety, when increasing the core energy release irregularity ratio, it is necessary that the neutron field monitoring is carried out by the detector with a minimum response time, but the rhodium SPND (like any other activation detector) does not fit this requirement [1,10,11,20,29]. Consequently, it is necessary to create a detector, whose, characteristics (operation life, response time, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%