1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(96)80070-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of different intraocular lens designs implanted in the bag after capsulorhexis

Abstract: After capsulorhexis and extracapsular cataract extraction, 12.0 mm, poly(methyl methacrylate), one-piece IOLs with modified C-shaped loops, 90 degree angulation at the haptic-optic junction, and an optic diameter between 6.0 and 6.5 mm performed best in the capsular bag.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12,13 Cadaver studies show that IOLs with a 12.0 mm haptic diameter distort the capsular bag less than larger IOLs and are more stable than smaller IOLs. 13 Results in previous studies suggest that a 2-haptic IOL with a haptic diameter smaller than 12.5 mm is not stable when implanted in a large capsular bag. 14 In contrast, our results indicate that the 3-haptic IOL we evaluated (haptic diameter 10.35 mm) is stable in a large capsular bag; to date, there has been only 1 case of IOL decentration in our highly myopic population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 Cadaver studies show that IOLs with a 12.0 mm haptic diameter distort the capsular bag less than larger IOLs and are more stable than smaller IOLs. 13 Results in previous studies suggest that a 2-haptic IOL with a haptic diameter smaller than 12.5 mm is not stable when implanted in a large capsular bag. 14 In contrast, our results indicate that the 3-haptic IOL we evaluated (haptic diameter 10.35 mm) is stable in a large capsular bag; to date, there has been only 1 case of IOL decentration in our highly myopic population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%