1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(99)00038-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of energy absorption in a close-celled aluminum foam under dynamic loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
129
1
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 290 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
129
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The nominal strain-rateε was defined as the ratio of the loading speed to the original height and varied from 1 × 10 −3 s −1 to 3 × 10 3 s −1 in the simulations. To compare with previous experimental results [1][2][3][4], the compressive strength was defined as the first peak stress (i.e. collapse stress), while the 0.2% offset yield point was used to characterise tensile strength.…”
Section: Fe Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The nominal strain-rateε was defined as the ratio of the loading speed to the original height and varied from 1 × 10 −3 s −1 to 3 × 10 3 s −1 in the simulations. To compare with previous experimental results [1][2][3][4], the compressive strength was defined as the first peak stress (i.e. collapse stress), while the 0.2% offset yield point was used to characterise tensile strength.…”
Section: Fe Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the stress wave effect on 04022-p.4 Figure 7. Predicted strain-rate sensitivity of the compressive (a) and tensile (b) strengths of Alporas foam for rate dependent and independent material models alongside available compression test data [1,3,4]. The dashed curve corresponds to the rate dependence of the cell-wall material.…”
Section: Strain-rate Sensitivities Of the Compressive And Tensile Strmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Significant enhancement of crushing stress was observed in the dynamic impact experiments of woods (Reid and Peng, 1997;Harrigan et al, 2005), aluminum honeycombs (Zhao and Gary, 1998;Hou et al, 2012) and foams (Mukai et al, 1999;Deshpand and Fleck, 2000;Tan et al, 2005a;Elnasri et al, 2007). Several shock models and mass-spring models have been proposed to understand the shock wave propagation in cellular materials under dynamic impact, such as the R-PP-L (rate-independent, rigid-perfectly plastic-locking) model (Reid and Peng, 1997), the mass-spring model (Li and Meng, 2002), the E-PP-R (elastic-perfectly plastic-rigid) model (Lopatnikov et al, 2003), the power law densification model and the D-R-PH (dynamic, rigidplastic hardening) shock model .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Finally, material commences to densify completely. Of importance is the fact that open-cell material is strain rate insensitive while rate sensitive response may be expected for closed-cell Al foam, for which elastic-plastic is typical and, hence, micro-inertia effect dominates [23][24][25]. The latter effect results in the increase of plateau stress when strain rate increases essentially.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%