2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of hydrodynamic pressure distribution in oil lubricated two-axial groove journal bearing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that all the previously derived and recorded values reflect a notable consistency and much accordance with their counterparts in the research introduced by Binu et. al [6]. However, it is clear that the recoded values relating to the error percentage in the research at hand appear to be notably lower than their peers in the above mentioned research of Binu.…”
Section: Theoretical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is noteworthy that all the previously derived and recorded values reflect a notable consistency and much accordance with their counterparts in the research introduced by Binu et. al [6]. However, it is clear that the recoded values relating to the error percentage in the research at hand appear to be notably lower than their peers in the above mentioned research of Binu.…”
Section: Theoretical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Other researches have focused their studies on the geometrical design of the two axial-groove journal bearing. Among those concerned with that issue were Binu et.al [6]. Having researched into the hydrodynamic pressure distribution in oil lubricated two-axial groove journal bearing, they have come out with the result that there was a noticeable difference between the experimentally recorded pressures and those recorded numerically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from theoretical validation, the maximum theoretical pressure is compared with experimental pressure 40 for two-groove journal bearing in Table 3. Obtained nondimensional maximum pressure is converted to dimensional pressure and then compared with available experimental maximum pressure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In earlier research, it was mentioned that the difference in theoretical and experimental results were due to losses in the loading system. 40 Also, variation in viscosity due to temperature variation and inertia effect has not been considered in the theoretical model, which perhaps contributes to higher theoretical pressure than the experimental.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason was that it didn't have the ability to measure dynamic pressure variation. The experimentally recorded pressures using the conventional approach were lower than the theoretical pressures by 20% (Binu, et al, 2015). Calculating the pressure distribution and load capacity of journal bearing by analytical method and finite element method was implemented by researchers among them were Nuruzzama et al, 2010.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%