2007
DOI: 10.1021/ef7002359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study of Oxy-Fuel Combustion and Sulfur Capture in a Mini-CFBC

Abstract: Oxy-fuel technology uses effectively pure oxygen for fossil fuel combustion in order to obtain a highly concentrated CO2 stream, suitable for direct compression and sequestration. It is an effective technology to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere from large point sources such as power generation plants. Oxy-fuel FBC technology has the combined advantage of producing high CO2 concentration flue gas and allowing excellent fuel flexibility. In addition, with external cooling of the recirculated so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
74
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
74
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Sulfur capture proceeds in this case via direct sulfation of the raw limestone, as experimentally confirmed by the mini-CFB combustion test results reported by Jia et al [13]. The lower sulfation rate associated with direct sulfation of limestone [15] in this second option may not represent an issue as, due to constraints associated with the establishment of optimal bed solids inventories, sorbent particles usually experience residence times in CFB combustors that may well exceed the sulfation time scales.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). Sulfur capture proceeds in this case via direct sulfation of the raw limestone, as experimentally confirmed by the mini-CFB combustion test results reported by Jia et al [13]. The lower sulfation rate associated with direct sulfation of limestone [15] in this second option may not represent an issue as, due to constraints associated with the establishment of optimal bed solids inventories, sorbent particles usually experience residence times in CFB combustors that may well exceed the sulfation time scales.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The lower sulfation rate associated with direct sulfation of limestone [15] in this second option may not represent an issue as, due to constraints associated with the establishment of optimal bed solids inventories, sorbent particles usually experience residence times in CFB combustors that may well exceed the sulfation time scales. In this respect, contradictory data have appeared in the literature [13,14] indicating the need for further studies to clarify this point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alstom [10], VTT and Foster Wheeler [11], Metso [12], Czestochowa University of Technology [7], and Canmet Energy [5,8,9,13] have experimented in oxyfuel combustion with CFB combustors at scales up to 4 MW th . The Fundación Ciuden [14] in Spain is developing two plants able to operate from conventional air combustion to oxy-fuel combustion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is a 20 MW th PC boiler and the other is a CFB combustor of 15 MW th operating in air-mode and 30 MW th operating in oxy-mode. The research group of Canmet Energy [8][9] is involved in testing a CFB combustor of 100 kW th with flue gas recycle. Operating at ~850 ºC, they found lower sulphation in oxy-fuel combustion than in air combustion conditions, but the sulphation improved working with a petroleum coke by increasing the operation temperature, that is, changing from direct to indirect sulphation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the effluent CO 2 stream from oxyfuel combustion from a fluidized bed pilot plant combustor (CanmetENERGY, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) contained gas impurities that included 5.2 vol% O 2 , 221 ppm CO, 1431 ppm SO 2 , and 243 ppm NO (Jia et al 2007). The expected CO 2 stream from an oxyfuel combustion plant includes 5.8 vol% N 2 , 4.7 vol% O 2 , 4.47 vol% Ar, 100 ppm NO x , 50 ppm SO 2 , 20 ppm SO 3 , and 50 ppm CO (IEAGHG 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%