2015
DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2015.1070101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of the Mode I adhesive fracture energy in DCB specimens bonded with a polyurethane adhesive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3c). Although the spring constant for adhesively bonded parts can be defined in several different ways [15][16][17][18][19][20], a spring constant assuming the deformation of the adhesive under a plane strain state, given as…”
Section: Model Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3c). Although the spring constant for adhesively bonded parts can be defined in several different ways [15][16][17][18][19][20], a spring constant assuming the deformation of the adhesive under a plane strain state, given as…”
Section: Model Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crack length is strongly affected by the adhesive deformation, leading to a calculation error in the fracture energy. Therefore, the difference between the theoretical crack length and the measured one was investigated, and the crack length correction in the corrected beam theory (CBT) [10][11][12][13] and an effective crack length, namely compliance-based beam method (CBBM), [14,15] have been respectively derived. Replacing the adhesive layer with an elastic foundation, i.e., the Winkler foundation, closed form solutions were obtained for the DCB [15][16][17][18] and other test methods [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these methods have one thing in common: one needs to measure the crack length during the failure process to calculate the fracture energy by means of beam theory. For this, several approaches have been developed: (i) measuring the crack length directly by crack length monitoring [22,27,34,35,36] or (ii) estimating the crack length by measurement of the compliance [33,37,38,39]. However, the calculation of the fracture energy is challenging when relying upon monitoring of the crack length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 10 shows the fracture energy of the polyurethane adhesive in the quasistatic and impact tests. The average fracture energy was 2475 J/m 2 for the quasi-static Time [8,11], was within the acceptable range for both adhesives. In contrast, the comparison of the results with different loading conditions indicates that there is a difference in rate dependence of the adhesive types.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%