1993
DOI: 10.1063/1.464165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of the surface structure of diblock copolymer films using microscopy and x-ray scattering

Abstract: The surface structure of a model system was measured in real space by atomic force and optical microscopies, and compared with that obtained from measurements in reciprocal space by x-ray reflectivity and off-specular scattering at grazing incidence. Experiments were performed on films of symmetric diblock copolymers of polystyrene and polymethylmethacrylate, whose surfaces were covered by micrometer-size islands or holes (domains) of uniform height. The correlation functions extracted from the images of the f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They measured the surface structure in realspace by atomic force and optical microscopies, which was compared with the results from the reciprocal space, i.e., specular and off-specular reflectivity profiles. 12 The height of the holes determined from the scattering and microscopic methods agreed well, although the internal morphology in the thin film was only assumed and left unclear. Thus, even though the reflectivity measurement is a very powerful technique, it always involves some kinds of assumption(s) due to the lack of complete real-space structural information.…”
supporting
confidence: 48%
“…They measured the surface structure in realspace by atomic force and optical microscopies, which was compared with the results from the reciprocal space, i.e., specular and off-specular reflectivity profiles. 12 The height of the holes determined from the scattering and microscopic methods agreed well, although the internal morphology in the thin film was only assumed and left unclear. Thus, even though the reflectivity measurement is a very powerful technique, it always involves some kinds of assumption(s) due to the lack of complete real-space structural information.…”
supporting
confidence: 48%
“…We may also d e k e the average form factor of each island where the integration is over the surface area (4) of the island, and a i is the in-plane component of a. If dJ is the fractional coverage of the surface by the islands, then it may be shown that [2] where The total surface area is A and represents the specular reflectivity, while the off-specular scattering is given by where s(%) represents the in-plane structure factor of the islands, (A is the total surface area.) The second term subtracts the contribution of the average island density, which contributes only to S S W (~) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These features were incorporated by into a layer (herein referred to as the “top stack”) consisting of a half layer of PDMS, a full layer of PS, and a second half layer of PDMS. The electron density of the top stack was reduced by an amount commensurate with surface coverage of islands or holes calculated from AFM height images . Only the layer thicknesses of PS and PDMS in the top stack and bottom stack and the interfacial roughness were allowed to change during fitting of the calculated reflection curves to the experimental XRR data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%