“…The presence of different types of vegetation and microtopography features which are not resolved by the DTM increase the value of the effective roughness coefficient, which has to account for all these unresolved features. Manning numbers much larger than those commonly used in river hydraulics applications, and which depend on the vegetative cover, the microtopography, the rainfall intensity and the water depth have been previously reported in computations involving rainfall‐runoff transformation over rough terrains [ Engman , ; Fraga et al ., ; Muñoz‐Carpena et al ., ; Wilson et al ., ]. Since no calibration data are available for this test case, the same Manning coefficient was used with all the schemes, which was fixed to a value of 0.15, constant in the whole catchment.…”