2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on burning rates of large-scale hydrocarbon pool fires under controlled wind conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under ventilated conditions, fuel mass burning rate has a certain ratio relationship at low and high altitudes. It is m l /m h ≈ 0.75 compared to the maximum burning rate ratio measured by Lei et al 26 This is close to the burning rate ratio of 0.74 that was obtained in the experiment by Zhou et al 32 where Jet‐A aviation kerosene was used at Lhasa (3650 m, 65.2 kPa) and Hefei (20 m, 101 kPa). The decrease in burning rate will further affect parameters including air entrainment, flame shape, flame and smoke temperature, flame radiation and smoke density, making the combustion law of liquid fuel at high altitudes quite different to that at sea level.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Under ventilated conditions, fuel mass burning rate has a certain ratio relationship at low and high altitudes. It is m l /m h ≈ 0.75 compared to the maximum burning rate ratio measured by Lei et al 26 This is close to the burning rate ratio of 0.74 that was obtained in the experiment by Zhou et al 32 where Jet‐A aviation kerosene was used at Lhasa (3650 m, 65.2 kPa) and Hefei (20 m, 101 kPa). The decrease in burning rate will further affect parameters including air entrainment, flame shape, flame and smoke temperature, flame radiation and smoke density, making the combustion law of liquid fuel at high altitudes quite different to that at sea level.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The burn rate is expressed as: m=0.0581e0.65D The parameters of 0.058 kg/m 2 s and 0.65 were obtained. Lei et al 26 obtained a burning rate of 0.077 kg/m 2 s at a large‐scale open space by using RP‐5 aviation kerosene in plain area experiments. Lam et al 28 measured burning rates of 0.055 kg/m 2 s,0.07 kg/m 2 s, 0.057 kg/m 2 and, 0.05 kg/m 2 s. Blanchat et al 24 used JP‐8 fuel in a 7.92 m oil pool experiment, measuring burning rates of 0.071, 0.062 and 0.068 kg/m 2 s. Gottuk et al 29 used JP‐8 fuel in a 0.68 and 0.9 m oil pool experiment and recorded burning rates of 0.027 kg/m 2 and, 0.036 kg/m 2 s. J. Suo‐Antilla et al 30 measured 0.062 kg/m 2 s using JP‐8 fuel in an 18.9 m pool fire experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Current ISBs may be classified as pool fires, where the air entrainment toward the fire occurs only in the radial direction. A common scenario is when the buoyant plume from the fire is subjected to a crosswind, resulting in an inclined plume, sometimes enhancing the burning rate. , Still, substantial increases in burning efficiency are not possible with this entrainment configuration because when the pool diameters increase beyond 1 m, heat feedback is dominated by radiation, causing a plateauing of mass flux . An entrainment condition that consists of azimuthal flow in addition to radial flow results in the formation of fire whirls, which can aid in increasing both convective and radiative heat feedback, and may hold the key to improving burning characteristics of ISBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%