2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-014-1828-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on drag-reduction effect due to sinusoidal riblets in turbulent channel flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By applying the feedback control using the adjoint equations (Bewley et al 2001;Kasagi et al 2012) to heat transfer in turbulent channel flow with blowing and suction on the wall, Hasegawa & Kasagi (2011) and Yamamoto et al (2013) have numerically achieved the dissimilarity even when the Prandtl number is equal to unity. Experimentally, several practicable passive or active control techniques have been developed using riblet (Sasamori et al 2014), permeable wall (Suga et al 2011), micro actuator and sensor (Kasagi et al 2009), and so on. Hence, the accomplishment of dissimilar heat transfer enhancement by flow control might be expected in the near future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By applying the feedback control using the adjoint equations (Bewley et al 2001;Kasagi et al 2012) to heat transfer in turbulent channel flow with blowing and suction on the wall, Hasegawa & Kasagi (2011) and Yamamoto et al (2013) have numerically achieved the dissimilarity even when the Prandtl number is equal to unity. Experimentally, several practicable passive or active control techniques have been developed using riblet (Sasamori et al 2014), permeable wall (Suga et al 2011), micro actuator and sensor (Kasagi et al 2009), and so on. Hence, the accomplishment of dissimilar heat transfer enhancement by flow control might be expected in the near future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a simplified riblet geometry, a maximum DR of almost 10% has been obtained [5]. In the search for even higher values of DR, many variations on the standard riblet geometries have been investigated [19], such as hierarchical or compound riblets [91], riblets on a spanwise traveling surface wave [47], oscillating riblets [88,37,83], riblets in a wave-like pattern (either in phase [36] or out of phase [69]) and riblets combined with drag-reducing polymers [12]. The rationale behind these alternatives is to further reduce drag by somehow incorporating other drag-reducing methods, such as oscillating walls or polymer addition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be obviously seen that for the smooth surface, as time goes on, the near‐wall streamwise vortices can frequently and directly scour the wall on a large scale, resulting in the shear stress with a large zone as shown in Figure a. However, for the drag‐reducing case presented in Figures b1–b5, the streamwise vorticity of ωx+=0.1 almost cannot intrude into the groove valley and is just above the groove, indicating that the motions of near‐wall fluid in y direction (the normal motions) are mild and the momentum exchange is weaker within the groove valley, which is the main reason for the significant suppression of turbulent fluctuations within the groove valley found by other researchers in their drag‐reducing microgrooves. Moreover, it can also be visually found that the higher shear stress caused by the scour of high‐speed fluid only occurs in a small region near the groove tips, and the fluid is “quiet” within the groove valley, resulting in a lower shear stress with a large region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%