2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on energy dissipation of layered backfill under impact load

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their study not only confirms that layering affects the integrity of CTB but also that as the layering angle increases from 20° to 25°, the shear strength and cohesion decreases by 35% and 43%, respectively. When it comes to energy dissipation during blasting of secondary stope, Sun et al 30 highlighted that as the number of layers increase, the absorption energy of the CTB increased gradually. In addition to these findings, the authors reported that the deformation of layered backfill mainly occurred at the layered position with a severe degree of fragmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their study not only confirms that layering affects the integrity of CTB but also that as the layering angle increases from 20° to 25°, the shear strength and cohesion decreases by 35% and 43%, respectively. When it comes to energy dissipation during blasting of secondary stope, Sun et al 30 highlighted that as the number of layers increase, the absorption energy of the CTB increased gradually. In addition to these findings, the authors reported that the deformation of layered backfill mainly occurred at the layered position with a severe degree of fragmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic compressive strength of CTB is usually obtained by performing the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) tests on CTB samples (Zhang et al, 2017;Sun et al, 2022). Many experiments have shown that CTB materials' mechanical behavior differs at different strain rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%